Gender bias research can create misleading assumptions about female behaviour and fail to challenge -ve stereotypes.
For example, he statistic that women are twice as likely to be diagnosed with depression as men may be slowed by hormonal fluctuations which affect mood.
This statistic may lead doctors (mostly men) to give diagnoses fulfilling the (incorrect) expectation that women are more at risk of depression.
Such research provides scientific justification to deny women opportunities within the workplace or wider society.
Not many senior, female psychologists (B):
At senior research level women are in minority so their concerns may not be reflected in the research questions asked.
Male researchers are more likely to have their work published and studies that find significant gender differences are more likely to be published then those that do not.
Also, lab experiments may disadvantage women as female ppts are usually paired with a male researcher who has the power to label them unreasonable or irrational.
Therefore, psychology may be guilty of institutional sexism that creates bias in the theory or research.
Double Standards (B):
Essentialists psychology suggests that gender differences reported by psychologists are inevitable and 'fixed' in nature.
In the 1930s, 'scientific' research revealed how intellectual activity like attending university would shrivel a women's ovaries and harm her chances of giving birth (Walkerdine 1990).
Such essentialist accounts in psychology are often politically motivated arguments disguised as biological 'facts'.
This often creates 'double standards' in the way that the same behaviour is viewed from a different male and female perspective.
Qualitative Data Collection (B):
There are ways to reduce this gender bias which appears in much psychological research.
Feminist Worrell (1992) suggested more qualitative methods should be used to measure female behaviour like meaningful real life contexts.
She also suggested that diversity within groups of women should be studied more instead of looking at the comparisons between women and men. (We should reduce constant comparison with men)
In conclusion, methods which use qualitative data collection are much more beneficial in understanding gender differences rather than quantitative.