Cards (15)

  • Definition
    Common law offence where
    • D commits an unlawful act
    • That was dangerous
    • Causing V's death
    • MR of unlawful act
  • Unlawful act
    Must be
    • A crime not a tort
    • Successful (all elements satisfied)
    • Not an omission
  • R v Franklin
    Must be a crime not a civil tort
  • R v Lamb
    Must satisfy all elements
  • R v Lowe
    Omissions cannot be used for UAM
  • 'Dangerous'
    Objective test ( DPP V Newsbury and Jones)
    Would the reasonable and sober man recognise the risk of some physical harm? ( R v Church)
  • JM and SM
    As long as some harm is foreseeable, the type doesn't need to be.
  • R v Dawson
    Harm must be physical and foreseeable
  • R v Goodfellow
    Can be aimed at property if some harm was forseeable
  • Causing V's death
    Legal and factual causation
    • R v White (but for test)
    • R v Kimsey (De minimus test)
    • R v Cheshire (sig contirbution)
  • R v Mitchell
    Acts of TPs cab break chain of causation
  • R v Kennedy
    Vs own act can break Chain of causation if it was a sig contibution
  • R v Lewis
    V's own act Must be daft and unforeseeable to break chain of causation
  • MR
    Must be that of unlawful act
  • R v Lamb
    D doent need MR for death or even harm, only that of the unlawful act