DNA produces instructions for physical features like hair colour, eye colour and also physical features such as neurotransmitter levels and size of brain structures.
How does the genetic explanation explain crime?
Genetic explanations for crime suggest that offenders inherit a gene or combination of genes which predispose them to commit crime.
Twin study
Christiansen (1977) studied 3500 twin pairs in Denmark and found concordance rates for offender behaviour.
35% for monozygoticmale twins and 13% for dizygoticmale twins.
This included all twins in a region of Denmark between 1880 and 1910.
This indicates that offending behaviour and underlying predisposing traits are inherited.
Adoption studies
Crowe, found that adopted children whose biological mother had a criminal record have a 50% risk of having a criminal record by the age of 18.
Whereas, adopted children whose biological mother didn’t have a criminal record only had a 5% risk.
Candidate genes
Tiihonen et al, suggested that 2 genes (MAOA and CDH13) may be associated with violent crime.
Carried out a genetic analysis of 800 Finnish offenders.
Analysis found that 5-10% of all severe violent crime in Finland is attributed to MAOA and CDH13 genotype.
What does the MAOA gene regulate?
Regulates serotonin in the brain and has been linked to aggression.
What does CDH13 link to?
Substances abuse and attention deficit disorder.
Adoption study
Midnick et al, study of 14,000 adoptees
Found that 15% of sons adopted by a criminal family went on to be criminals compared to 20% who biological parents were criminals.
What issues are associated with twin studies?
The assumption of equal environments for both twins.
For example, it is assumed by researchers by studying twins, environmental factors are held constant because twins are brought up together and therefore must experience similar environments.
However, this shared environment assumption may apply more to MZ twins than DZ twins because MZ twins look identical and people tend to treat them more similarly.
The high concordance rates for MZ twins may be because they are treated more similarly than DZ twins.
How does the genetic explanation provide support for the diathesis stress model for offending?
Mednick et al conducted a study on over 13,000 Danish adoptees, when neither the biological nor adoptive parents had convictions, the % of adoptees that did was 13.5%.
However when either of the biological parents had convictions this rose to 20% and when both biological and adoptive parents did it was 24.5%.
This shows that the genetic and environmental influence both have a role to play in offending behaviour.
What problems are associated with adoption studies?
It is hard to separate genetic and environmentalinfluences due to late adoptions.
Many adoptions take place when children are older, so have already spent several years with their biological parents.
This means that in the early and arguably most influential years, late-adopted children are still very much environmentally influenced by their biological parents.
Therefore this suggests that assessing the relative impact of nature and nurture may only be possible with early adoptions where contact with biological parents does not occur.