9.5 Urban Drainage

Cards (20)

  • Built up areas need to be drained to remove surface water run off
    This has traditionally been achieved using pipe systems. Water quality issues have become increasingly importan; pollutants from urban areas are being washed into rivers or into the ground and polluted.
  • Rural - natural ground cover, more vegetation so more evapotranspiration. 40% evapotranspiration, 25% shallow infiltration and 25% deep infiltration.
  • Suburban - 35-50% impermeable surfaces
    30% runoff, 35% evapotranspiration, 20% shallow infiltration and 15% deep infiltration
  • Central urban - 75-100% impermeable surfaces, less trees less evapotranspiration
    55% run off, 30% evapotranspiration, 10% shallow infiltration and 5% deep infiltration
  • Hard engineering
    • river straightening
    • embankments
    • diversion spillways
    • channelisation
  • Soft engineering
    • afforestation
    • riverbank conservation
    • floodplain zoning
    • river restoration
  • SUD's - designed to reduce the potential impact on new and existing developments with respect to surface water drainage discharges
  • Advantages of SUD's:
    • improve water quality
    • increase green space
    • evapotranspiration reduces urban heat island effect
    • helps improve biodiversity
    • prevents water pollution
    • recharges groundwater to help prevent drought
  • Disadvantages of SUD's
    • cities are short on space for ponds and wetlands
    • infiltration can spread pollutants when near industries
    • cost
    • maintenance
  • SUD's examples:
    Swales/Retention basins - allow shallow, broad vegetated channels designed to store run off and remove water
    Permeable pavements - focus on diverting water into the ground, increasing infiltration. Slows down runoff and traps any pollutants into the soil
    Wetlands - shallow ponds covered in aquatic vegetation. Slows flow for an extended period to allow sediment to settle and to remove contaminants
    green roofs, water butts
  • The Cheonggyecheon River Project, Seoul South Korea
    • decking posed safety risks
    • elevated freeway and concrete deck were dismantled
    • 22 bridges were built to improve movement north to south across the sea
    • car use discourage, raid bus lanes added
    • underground waterways were redirected to create a new stream bed with landscaped banks and foundation and stones of earlier bridges were included as decorative elements
    • recreational areas, waterfront decking and stepping stones
    • stream widens which is designed to look overgrown and untamed
  • The Cheonggyecheon River Project, Seoul South Korea
    • has become popular with residents and visitors
    • traffic speeds slowed by 12%, more pedestrian activity
    • 2.5 degrees reduction in temperatures
    • reestablished lost habitats
    • not inclusive design
  • Lamb drove, Cambourne
    Background:
    • development of 35 affordable homes
    • relatively low lying county where flooding in river valleys is a major concern
    • European funded project
    Aim:
    • showcase practical ad innovative sustainable water management techniques with new residential developments
    • demonstrates SUD's are a viable and attractive alternative
  • Lamb drove, Cambourne
    Plan:
    • green roofs, filter strip, swale, retention pond, permeable paving and water butts
    • Swales collect all excess water from the site, further slowing the flow
    Outcome:
    project proven successful
    cost effective, both construction and ongoing maintenance costs have been 10% less than conventional pipe drainage systems
    substantial improvements in the biodiversity, ecology and subsequent quality of life
    resulted in the improvement of water quality
  • River hydrographs - shows how the amount of discharge in a river and how it changes after a rainfall event
  • Enfield
    • north London
    • regular floods
    • heavily urbanised
    • caused problem for drainage and water quality
  • Enfield - project
    • 2012
    • reduce flood risk and reduce impact of flooding habitats
    • decrease surface run off from roads
    • provide more habitats for species
  • Enfield - SUD's
    • vegetation and shrubs around road to absorb surface run off
    • wetlands
    • rain planters - in schools to collect rainwater
  • Enfield - urbanised
    • increased surface run off and channel flow increased, increased intensity and duration of floods
    • over 9000 homes at risk
    • surface run off from roads have increased pollutants
  • Enfield - outcome
    • flood risk seems reduced
    • sud's reduce ammonia levels
    • increased species population
    • pollution and litter in rivers still a problem