Occurs when those who are in a minority of people persuade others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviours
Internalisation is publicly changing behaviour to fit in with a group while also agreeing with them privately
An internal and external change in behaviour
The deepest level of conformity
Ways to change someone's opinion:
Drugs
Religion
Politics
Environment
Moscovici et al (1969) stated that being consistent and unchanging in a view is more likely to influence the majority than if a minority is inconsistent and changes their mind
Moscovici et al (1969) - Procedure
Femaleparticipants were shown 36blue sides of different intensity and asked to report the colours
There were two confederates (minority) and four participants (majority)
Consistent condition - in the first part of the experiment, the confederates answered green for each of the 36 slides, they were consistent
Inconsistent condition - In the second part they answered green 24 times and blue 12 times, they were inconsistent
Moscovici et al (1969) - Findings
When the confederates were consistent in their answers about 8% of participants said the slides were green
When the confederates answered inconsistently about 1% of participants aid the slides were green
Consistency
If a view is consistent amongst others, this increases the interest from others
Synchronic consistency - all saying the same thing
Diachronic consistency - saying the same thing for a long period of time
Commitment
Extreme activities can draw attention to the minorities
Majority groups may pay more attention
The augmentation principle - the willingness to sacrifice things for a cause (Jail, death)
Flexibility
Nemeth (1986) argues that consistency isn't the most important factor that affects the majority as it can be interpreted negatively
If we can repeat our arguments over time, it can be seen as unbending, dogmatic and inflexible. This can put off the majority and can reduce chances of changing their opinion
The minority need to be prepared to be flexible and prepared to adapt their views
Both consistency and flexibility are important
How does change occur - Depth of thought
If we hear something we agree with it doesn't necessarily make us think
Whereas, if we hear something we don't agree with, it makes us stop and think - especially if its convincing and passionate
This promotes deeper thinking and initiates the process of conversion to the minority view point
Over time, increasing numbers of people switch from the majority viewpoint to the minority viewpoint
The more this happens, the faster the conversion rate - the snowball effect
Latane (1981) Social Impact Theory - Strength
this is how important influencing an individual or group of people is to the person
Trans-situation strength - this exists no matter what the situation is, including the sources age, appearance, authority, and perceived intelligence
Situation specific - this looks closer at the situation at hand and the behaviour the target is being asked to perform (EG, you may be more likely to listen to a doctor for medical advice, but not designing advice)
Latane (1981) Social Impact theory - Immediacy
Someone is more likely to influence another if they are close to each other at the time of the influence
Physical immediacy - how physically close to the source is the target
Temporal immediacy - target is more likely to be influence immediately gayer the source has tried to influence them
Social immediacy - If the source is close friends or family members with the target, they may be more likely to influence the,
If someone is of the same gender, sexuality, or religion they may be more likely to be influenced as they're more relatable
Latane (1981) Social Impact theory - Number
This involves the number of people there is in a group
There is a rule called psychosocial law which state that at some point, the number of influencers has less of an effect
influence significantly increases up to 5 or 6 sources
Once past this, the impact increases but at a decreasing rate