Differential gene duplication and rapid sequence evolution due to genetic conflict within species are common mechanisms of intrinsic reproductive incompatibilities between species.
The same principles (variation, heredity, selection, and drift) that lead to the evolution of genes, genomes, and traits within species also contribute to the evolution of new species.
Before the ability to study evolution at the molecular level, there was no inkling that much of evolution was in fact a result of genetic drift and not natural selection.
The number of amino acid differences between two different species in some molecule is directly proportional to the number of generations since their divergence from a common ancestor in the evolutionary past.
Evolution can repeat itself by altering the very same nucleotide in independently arising sickle-cell mutations that lead to adaptive resistance to malaria.
Most genes in a genome are evolving under purifying selection to maintain sequence conservation, but some genes show evidence of positive selection for adaptive sequence changes.
Among the evidence for the prevalence of neutral evolution is that the number of amino acid differences between two different species in some molecule—for example, hemoglobin—is directly proportional to the number of generations since their divergence from a common ancestor in the evolutionary past.
New DNA may arise by duplication of the entire genome (polyploidy), a frequent occurrence in plants, or by various mechanisms that produce duplicates of individual genes or sets of genes.
The mutational processes that generate variation within the genome act at random, but the selective process that sorts out the advantageous and disadvantageous variants is not random.
The theory of evolution by natural selection explains the changes that take place in populations of organisms as the result of changes in the relative frequencies of different variants in the population.
The fate of duplicated genes was once thought that because the ancestral function is provided by the original gene, duplicate genes are essentially spare genetic elements that are free to evolve new functions.
In cases where the ancestral gene has more than one function and more than one regulatory element, as for most “toolkit” genes involved in development, a third possible outcome is that initial mutations inactivate or alter one regulatory element in each duplicate.
The detailed analysis of genomes and population-genetic considerations has led to a better understanding of the alternative fates of new gene duplicates, with the evolution of new function being just one pathway.
Detailed analyses of variation in the human genome has revealed that individual humans commonly carry small duplications that result in variation in gene-copy number.