Save
...
tort
negligence eval
duty
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Brooke Lennox
Visit profile
Cards (8)
++ supports aims of tort -
morality
(
neighbour
principle)
--
caparo
test - fair, just and reasonable test is
vague
and
unpredictable
(favours
public
authorities) (
hill
) may cause defensive
policing
, medicine
++
caparo
test - fair, just and reasonable (
hill
) vagueness can be good as courts decide
case
by
case
, prevents
floodgates
-- foreseeable and reasonable are
subjective
terms
++ only apply caparo test in
novel
circumstance (
robinson
) better,
saves
time
-- no definition for proximity, too
vague
with unclear
case
law (
bourhill
)
++ (bourhill) prevents
floodgates
-- overlap of
foreseeability
between
caparo
and
remoteness
for damage