The father in attachment research is anyone who takes on the role of the main male attachment figure
There is evidence to support the difference in primary and secondary attachment of fathers e.g. Tiffany Field
Tiffany Field filmed 4 month old babies in interaction with primary caregiver mothers and father and secondary caregiver fathers
Tiffany Field found that primary caregiver fathers acted more similarly to primary caregiver mothers than secondary caregiver fathers e.g. interactional synchrony, reciprocity
Tiffany Field's research shows that fathers have the potential to provide close emotional attachment but only when given the role of primary caregiver
Grossman et.al. carried out a longitudinal study where babies' attachments were studied until they were into their teens
Grossman found that the quality of a babies attachment with mothers but not fathers was related to the child's attachments in adolescence, suggesting attachment to fathers is less important
Grossman found that the quality of fathers' play with babies was related to the quality of adolescent attachments, suggesting that fathers have a larger role in play and stimulation than emotional development
There is a lack of reliability in research into role of the father as they do not differentiate between primary and secondary attachment
McCallum & Golombok consistently show that children from single mother and lesbian-parent households do not develop differently from heterosexual households
Research into role of the father has real-life application as mothers may feel pressured into taking on the stereotypical mother role so can be reassured by evidence that fathers can become primaryattachment figures