Most modern theories of language development recognize that language is shaped by environmental input + biologically predisposed opposed to learn language in general.
They draw on the strengths of the theories covered so far
These theories also recognize more the role of the child as an active agent as opposed to just a passive recipient.
It’s not the case that the child is just constantly receiving language input, they are a conversational partner, and caregivers accommodate their language to the children’s language ability
Statistical learning approach
Builds on the domain-general connectionist accounts, but emphasis is on tracking the probability of sequences/patterns of speech sounds occurring.
Creating ‘rules’ or patterns
Language learning becomes more sophisticated as previous evidence is used to evaluate the strength of the rule or pattern
Evidence for the Statistical approach
Saffran and colleagues (1996) → 8-month-olds heard strings of syllables that contain some syllables that tended to co-occur together. After listening for a few minutes, infants seem to learn which groups of sound reliably occur together as words.
Indicated by their preference for novel combinations of these sounds.