Save
Provisional Govt
Opposition to PG
Nationalities
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
nom
Visit profile
Cards (23)
Rural populations tended to identify with local, not national, loyalties.
Finland
and
Poland
= history of
nationhood
Muslim
Areas =
pan-Islamism
and cultural
autonomy
but
control
of Russian state
Ukraine
= nationality mixed with social concerns of
peasants
rebelling against Polish and Russian
landowners
Liberals
wanted to maintain the integrity of the Russian state.
Esp
Kadets
SRs
were more open to national demands
First
All Russian Congress of Soviets in June 1917
resolution was passed recognising the principle of
self-determination
, but leaving action to the
CA
Third Coalition Cabinet
issued a statement formally recognising a right to self-determination, but only based on
CA
Bolshs
were more accommodating to the nationalities -
internationalist
ideology
Ukraine compromised
22%
of Russia's population, resources of
grain
coal and
iron
, and on border with
Germany
and
Austria-Hungary
Feb Rev caused the organisation of the
Central Rada
, dominated by
SRs
and Soc
Dems
, called for
autonomous
Ukraine
sent a delegation to
Petrograd
in
May 1917
calling for
PG
support
June
= issued declaration calling for
Free Ukraine
PG sent a delegation to Ukraine including
Kerensky
PG made
concessions
to Ukraine, allowing a degree of
self-government
, released on
July 2
, provoking a crisis in PG as
Kadet ministers
resigned
Ukrainian nationalism was
fragmented
urban centres dominated by
Poles
and
Russians
peasants
mostly Ukrainians
By Autumn of
1917
,
Central Rada
represented most
Ukrainian
national sentiment
January
1918, declared full
independence
Finland historically enjoyed more
autonomy
than other nationalities
Finland accepted Russia's temporary right to control
military
and
foreign affairs
PG said Fin's status could only be governed by
CA
Kerensky openly
threatened
them
5
July
, Finnish Parliament passed a law declaring Finnish sovereignty
PG
forced parliament to
dissolve
All major parties, including
Swedish
ones, wanted independence
Only
Bolshs
supported them in Russia
Finland was facing a
class
divide as workers demanded better economic conditions
In summer, became so militant that they formed
Red Guards Units
and conservative elites formed a
Home Guard
Finland on brink of
civil war
Finland declared
Finnish
independence
October 19
Estonia and Latvia had no history of an
independent
state but wanted
administrative
boundaries to be drawn on
ethnic
lines
Latvia and Estonia were formed as separate
districts
,
concession
made
In Estonia, elected assembly
Maapaev
pushed for more
independence
and relations w PG
deteriorated
25 Sept, called for
autonomous
Estonia
Estonians not
united
In Lativa the
Bolsh
dominated Social Democrat party became dominant
b/c Latvian Germans, Jews, Russians made up the
upper classes
and Latvians were mostly
peasants
More
industrialised
area, peasants
landless
Riga was captured
Sept 1917
by
Germans
Latvian riflemen were key supporters of
Bolshs
Islamic areas did not have a high sense of
national identity.
supported
Feb Rev
and wanted more
cultural autonomy
Divisions developed between
modern
minded
nationalists
who saw the
Feb Rev
as a chance for
Pan-Islamism
and the traditional
religious leadership.
Armenia
- Impact of 1915 Turkish genocide and fear of Turkish attack made
Armenians
support Russia
In
Georgia
,
Menshs
already had popularity, appealed to peasants who resented the
Armenian
middle class and
Russian
officials
Jews were split politically, no uniform voice emerged
3.5
mill concentrated in
Pale
2
mill concentrated in
Poland
and
Lithuania
Feb Rev removed govt oppression of
Jews
and many assumed local and
government
posts.
20
% of Executive Committee of Petrograd Soviet was
Jewish
, including
Trotsky