Actus Reus - physical part of a crime (Guilty Act)
positive, voluntary act
If the d has no control over actions, he has not committed the actus reus
Hill v Baxter - swarm of bees, struck on head by stone, or heart attack while driving
Actus Reus can be satisfied in a number of ways:
conduct (action) crimes
consequence (result) crimes
circumstances (state of affairs) crimes
Conduct:
actus reus is the prohibitedconduct in doing the actions
consequences is irrelevant
act/omission
R v Archer - committed perjury in libel case against the 'star' in 1987
Consequence/ResultCrime:
majority of crimes
describes the situation where the illegalact is the outcome of Dsaction
actus reus is shown by the fact that the accused's behaviour must produce a particular consequence (result)
R v Gregory and Mott - defendants actions (stabbing) resulted in victims death, produced a murder charge
must be an actus reus causing the consequence
Marchant and Muntz - death, no criminal actus reus, not guilt
State of Affairs
'wrong place, wrong time'
circumstances are enough for the actus reus
Possession of an Offensive Weapon in a Public Place - s.1Prevention of Crime Act 1953
Possession of a Controlled Substance - s.5Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
State of affairs can be involuntary
Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent - actus reus was 'being' found drunk on public highway even though he had been placed there by the arresting police officers