Bolshs had not been involved in the genuinely popular Feb Rev
Lenin realised that the only wat for Molsh to have power was to orchestrate another uprising but under the control of Lenin
Throughout his career, Lenin advocated for the role of the Party as the leader of the workers, a small elite group.
call for popular support from workers and peasants 1917 was an attempt to use popular discontent for his own benefit
Lenin had not been happy about worker control of factories but saw it as a way for gaining support for Bolsheviks
Very soon after the Oct Rev he reimposed managerial control
When Bolshs had not won control of Soviets by July 1917, he called them useless because they were dominated by other socialist parties
- was now in favour of abandoning Soviets in pursuit of control of worker committees controlled by Bolshs
As soon as the Bolshs gained power, they remained there despite not having a popular mandate - decided to close down CA in Jan 1918
achieved by a small group of Revs led by Trotsky
MRC was a smokescreen to take power, meant to defend the city against Germans
There was hardly an attempt to defend Winter Palace, most of the soldiers defending it had already gone home
Trotsky himself estimated the number of people involved at only 30,000
Later attempts to present the Oct Rev as a popular rev were a myth - propaganda films
Most public services like transport in Petrograd proceeded as normal, most people did not even know it occurred
Only 3,000 soldiers total were protecting the Palace, with 200 women from the Shock Battalion of Death
they smoked, got drunk
By evening, only 300 troops remained
Support for Soviets was not unconditional:
Sukhanov (Bolshevik) said 'the mood was Bolshevik but rather slack and wavering'
support for Bolshs was a reaction to the PG and their failures
majority wanted a coalition govt of socialist parties
Arguably the Soviets would have gained power after the collapse of PG anyway without the uprising but Lenin hijacked this process to gain power for himself