This theory proposes that individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques and motives for criminal behaviour through association and interaction with different people
Scientific Basis
Edwin Sutherland (1924) developed a set of scientific principles that could explain all types of offending
'The conditions which are said to cause crime should be present when crime is present, and they should be absent when crime is absent'
His theory is designed to discriminate between individuals who become criminals and those who do not, whatever their class or ethnic background
Crime as a learned behaviour
Offending behaviour may be acquired in the same as any other behaviour through the process of learning
Frequency, length and personal meaning of social associations change the degree of influence
Crime can be learnt through reinforcement and modelling - if a child perceives praise or punishment, deviant behaviour can continue, and if role models are successful in crime it can result in vicarious reinforcement
Crime as a learned behaviour
This learning occurs often through interactions with significant others that the child associates with, such as the family and peer group
Criminality arises from two factors
Learned attitudes towards crime (Pro or Anti criminal attitudes)
The learning of specific criminal acts
Sutherland theorised 9 principles of offending
P1) Criminal behaviour is learned - not inherited, also the person who is not already trained in crime does not invent criminal behaviour
P2) Criminal behaviour is learned in interaction with other people in a process of communication - including verbal and gesture
P3) The principle part of the learning of criminal behaviour occurs within intimatepersonal groups
P4) When criminal behaviour is learned, the learning includes:
Techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very simple
The specific direction of the motives, drives, rationalisation, and attitudes
P5).The specific direction of the motives and drives is learned from the definition of the legal codes and are favourable or unfavourable
P6) A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favourable to violation of law over definitions unfavourable to violation of law
When people become criminals, they do so because of contact with criminal patterns but also isolation from criminal patterns
P7) Differential association may vary in frequency, duration, priority and intensity
Priority seems to be important principally through its selective influence, and intensity has to do with such things as the prestige of the source of criminal or anti criminal pattern with emotional reactions related to the association
P8) The process of learning criminal behaviour by association with criminal and ant-criminal patterns involve all the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning
P9) While criminal behaviour is an expression of general needs and values, it is not explained by those general needs and values since non-criminal behaviour is an expression of the same needs and values
Pro-Criminal attitudes
When a person is socialised into a group they will be exposed to values and attitudes towards the law
Some of the values will be pro-crime, some of these will be anti-crime
Sutherland argues that if the number of pro-criminal attitudes the person comes to acquire outweighs the number of anti-criminal attitudes, they are more likely to offend
the learning process is the same whether a person is learning criminality or conformity to the law
Pro-Criminal attitudes
Differential association suggests that it should be possible to mathematicallypredict how likely it is that an individual will commit crime if we have knowledge of the frequency, intensity and duration of which they have been exposed to deviant and non-deviant norms and values
Learning criminal acts
In addition to being exposed to pro-criminal attitudes, the offender may also learn particular techniques for committing crime
These might include how to break into someone's house through a locked window or hoe to disable a car stereo before stealing it
Learning criminal acts
As well as offering an account of how crime may 'breed' amongst specific social groups and in communities, Sutherland's theory can also account for why so many convicts released from prison go on to reoffend
It is reasonable to assume that while inside prison inmates will learn specific techniques of offending from other, more experienced criminals that they may be eager to put into proactive upon their release
This learning may occur through observational learning and imitation or direct tuition from criminal peers