Weakness

• Relying solely on self-ownership neglects the importance of external moral frameworks whether derived from religious, cultural, or societal norms
• Sceptics of self-ownership may express concerns about the potential for harm that individuals might inflict on themselves
• Individuals are not isolated entities and, as members of society, have social and moral obligations
• Limitations on self-ownership may be considered a means of protecting individuals from their own potentially harmful choices
• It could be argued that life is sacred, and decisions about life and death should be guided by the belief that human life has intrinsic value
• Some argue against autonomy by citing biblical passages that emphasize the sanctity of life
• Biblical quotes: 'Jeremiah 1:5 (Before I formed you in the womb I knew you. Before you were born I set you apart) Psalm 139:13-16 (For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb...)'
• The sanctity of life is deeply embedded in religious traditions
• Notural Moral Law recognizes the principle of double effect which allows for actions that may have both good and bad consequences
• Opponents of euthanasia might argue that allowing euthanasia undermines the inherent worth of human life


  They may advocate for supporting individuals through their suffering and providing palliative care, while affirming their dignity until natural death occurs
• Euthanasia frustrates the natural telos or purpose of human life according to Natural Moral Law


  It includes experiencing and overcoming suffering, finding meaning in life, and preparing for death in a way that respects the dignity of the individual
• Dignity and Autonomy

  Natural Moral Law affirms the dignity and autonomy of every human person
• Opponents of euthanasia might argue that true autonomy involves making decisions that align with moral principles and the well-being of oneself and others


  They may assert that facilitating euthanasia does not genuinely promote autonomy, as it can be influenced by external factors such as depression, coercion, or societal attitudes toward disability
• Intentionally ending a human life goes against the fundamental principle of the sanctity of life


  According to this view, human life is not something to be disposed of at will, but rather something to be protected and preserved
• Opponents of euthanasia might argue that intentionally ending a person's life violates the Principle of Respect for Life


  They may assert that respecting life means valuing it in all circumstances and finding ways to alleviate suffering without resorting to euthanasia
• Invitability of Life

  Natural Moral Law asserts that human life is inherently valuable and must be respected
• Therefore, euthanasia is considered morally wrong regardless of circumstances or intentions
• Teleological Perspective on Consequences: Some proponents of euthanasia might argue for it based on the positive consequences of ending suffering


  Opponents could employ a teleological perspective to argue against it, citing potential negative consequences such as erosion of trust in medical professionals, increased risk of abuse, and devaluation of human life