A "weak" claim is more general - a claim is "strong" if it entails the "weak" claim
Dualism says that the mental and the physical are both real and neither can be assimilated to the other. Descartes was a Dualist.
Monism says that the mind and body are not divided
Materialism/Physicalism/Mechanism: the mind is part of physical processes in the body
Behaviorism says psychological states are merely one type of behavior
Wittgenstein'sbehaviorism: "saying 'I am in pain' is a sophisticated sort of wince," or "the verbal expression of pain replaces crying and does not describe it"
Leibniz's Law: indiscernability of identicals - if two objects are identical, they must share all their properties
Descartes says we understand objects of sense through reasoning
Descartes said objects have primary and secondary qualities
Ryle was a Behaviorist
Ryle said philosophical puzzles are just turns of phrase or metaphor
Ryle was influenced by Wittgenstein ("sophisticated wince")
Ryle said mental states are complexes of actual or dispositional behavior
According to Ryle, saying "the body AND the mind" is a category mistake
According to Ryle, deterministic laws govern mental AND physical "bits"
Smart was an Identity Theorist
Smart says sensations are just a certain type of brain processes
Smart believed there were "irreducibly psychic" things
Smart believed that after-images were part of brain processes
According to Smart, "the word 'ghost' has a use" ≠ "ghosts exist"
Smart believes pain is a behavioral disposition
Smart thinks there can be non-identical concepts for one identical object
Putnam is a Functionalist
Putnam says there is "Multiple Realizability" of mental states - each can be achieved by different functional states (fizzbuzz)
Putnam says pain is a Functional State, not a Mental State
Searle was a Functionalist
Searle said one mental state entails/implies/necessitates the potential to be in another mental state ("Holism of the Mental")
Searle says functional use of language ≠ understanding
Nagel makes a distinction between Science and Qualia
Nagel says our experiences are separate from the "true nature of something" - multiple modes of representation do not make multiple objects
Jackson says Qualia are caused by physical objects/processes ("closed loop of the physical")
Jackson says epiphenomena are byproducts of evolutionary adaptation
Jackson says two reports of the same event are concurrent - there's no causal relationship between the reports
Nida-Rümelin is a Functionalist
Nida-Rümelin makes a distinction between Conceptual Functionalism and Psychofunctionalism
According to Nida-Rümelin, Conceptual Functionalism is analiticity and meaning of terms
According to Nida-Rümelin, Psychofunctionalism is an empirical hypothesis discoverable by science
According to Nida-Rümelin, a person with pseudonormal vision can have the same functional state, but a different mental state
Dennett says belief is an objective phenomenon discernible from a Predictive Strategy
Dennett's three predictive strategies are: Physical (physics), Design, and Economic