what are the characteristics of US election campaigns?
frequency
money
individuality
targeting swing states
mid-terms
getting the voting base out
how long does the 'visible campaign' take in the president's first term?
up to a year
when are candidates and parties campaigning in the US?
constantly
when does campaigning for the next presidential election unofficially begin?
mid-terms
when running for public office is the onus on the party or the individual?
individual
what does a candidate need to get themselves on the ballot?
enough nomination signatures and lots of campaign funds
a candidate for public office is supposed to create enough political momentum that the political party of their choice will nominate them as a result at the NNC
US campaigning is very focused on what?
galvanising the voting base and getting them out to vote
although a large number of americans will identify as 'independents', most will largely lean towards one party or another
what is 'Get rid of he vote'?
Voter suppression.
why might a political party use voter suppression?
to prevent a certain group of people from voting as they won't gain votes from them
what is an example of voter suppression?
north carolina -> voters must have a photo ID
what is another example of voter suppression?
new hampshire -> can only cast a vote in person
what is another example of voter supression?
Georgia -> ID requirements to apply for and return mail ballots
there is a focus on 'what' states during campaigning?
swing states
what are some key swing states?
Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina.
during campaigning there is an emphasis on the states that come first in the primary and caucus diary
why do parties want to secure a victory in the early primaries and caucuses?
it builds momentum and support
does spending more money guarantee a win?
no -> Hillary Clinton outspent Trump but lost
high spending is a result of what?
the vast size of the US
the absence of effective laws to limit or regulate the campaign funding
why are mid-terms significant?
they indicate public confidence in the president's performance -> most will lose support
what does it mean when a president is described as a 'lame duck'?
they don't have enough support in either house to pass legislation