The pressure to conform can be resisted if there are other people present who are not conforming.
It enables the naïve participant to be free to follow their own conscience.
Asch's 'unanimity variation' - the dissenter shows that the majority is no longer unanimous.
Obedience
The pressure to obey can be resisted if there is another person who is seen to disobey.
The disobedient model challenges the legitimacy of the authority figure, making it easier for others to disobey.
Milgram's 'dissenting peer' variation - the rate of obedience dropped from 65% to 10% when the genuine participant was joined by a disobedient confederate.
Real-world research support
R+
Susan Albrecht - Teen Fresh Start USA; 8 week programme to help pregnant adolescents to resist peer pressure to smoke
Social support provided by an older 'mentor/buddy'
Adolescents who had a 'buddy' were significantly less likely to smoke than a control group who didn't
++ External validity
Research support for dissenting peers
R+
Gamson et al - participants told to produce evidence that would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign
Higher levels of resistance in their study than Milgram's
Participants were in groups so could discuss what they were told to do
29 of 33 groups (88%) rebelled against their orders
Undermining the legitimacy of an authority figure
Social support explanation
Vernon & Allen - when dissenter had 'good eyesight', 64% of participants refused to conform. When there was no supporter at all only 3% of participants resisted
However, the study also showed that social support does not always help - when the dissenter had obviously poor eyesight resistance was only 36%