believes human nature is rational + guided by self-interest
role of state is to improve individuals situations
free-market capitalism + private property is heart of the economy
Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-97)
wrote ‘Vindication of the Rights of Women’ + argued that women are not naturally inferior to men - wrote during French Revolution, inspired by ideas of equality in France
believed men + women have equal capacity as rational beings
state should guarantee equal rights for men + women e.g full employment + education
society conditioned women to have limited ambitions
John Stuart Mill (1806-73)
‘On Liberty’ advocated women’s rights + written during Industrial Revolution
believed human nature was ‘constantly changing‘ + each individual is unique
approved of democracy + emphasised value of education to enable valid voting
wanted tolerance for minorities + laissez-faire capitalism
Thomas Hill Green
believed human nature was social + individualistic
emphasised necessity of equality of opportunity to achieve ‘social justice’
state should promote freedom by protecting humans from social injustice
supportive of laissez-faire capitalism
‘positive freedom’ - cooperation of all individuals within society, not just the lack of restraints
John Rawls (1921 - 2002)
believed mankind is selfish yet empathetic
‘veil of ignorance’ - if we got to choose a society blind, wed choose a fairer, more equal society -> advocated for equality of opportunity
strong advocate for enabling state + state intervention was needed fro equality of opportunity
supportive of Keynesian economics
Betty Friedan (1921 - 2006)
wrote ‘Feminine Mystique‘
believed women + men are equally capable
traditional society conditioned women to adopt certain gender roles - childcare/home-making
believed state should pass laws to bring about greater equality
women are capable of significant contributions to capitalist economy if historical bias is over come e.g equal pay laws
Classical liberalism - believe individual freedom is best achieved with minimal state + negative liberty - private property is a natural right
Modern Liberalism - believe the state must help in a more active way e.g economic redistribution
Individualism - importance of each individual
Natural right - idea that all humans are born with rights e.g right to light liberty + property
Minimal state - role of state must be restricted to preserve individual liberty
Enabling state - largerstate that helps individuals to achieve their potential
Positive liberty - freedom to live a fulfilling life with government interference if needed
Negative liberty - freedom from government interference
Developmental individualism - idea that individual freedom is linked to humans flourishing
Egoistical individualism - human beings are naturally drawn to their own selfish interests.
Meritocracy - system which promotes individual ability + achievement
Tolerance - being tolerant towards different ideas to reduce conflict
Foundational equality - idea that we are all born with equal entitlement
Social contract - (Locke + Hobbes) linked to Enlightenment thinkers -> indicates that the state should be a deal between government + governed where the governed should only defer to government if the state guarantees certain outcomes e.g protection of natural rights
Mechanistic theory - idea that the state was created by ‘man’ to serve the people and act in their interests
Harm Principle - John Stuart Mill - people should be free to act however they wish unless their actions were to harm someone else
State of nature - notion of what life was like before the emergence of the state -> used by Hobbes and Locke
State of law - Liberals have a more positive outlook of human nature + believe that the state of nature was tolerable , a state of law would only be desirable if it represented an improvement for the situation of the governed.
Two Treatises of Government -John Locke (Father of Lib) published in 1690
View of human nature:
egotistical individualism vs developmental individualism
state of nature based on natural rights, natural laws + natural justice -> tolerable, rational environment - life, liberty, property
a state of law is only viable if natural rights are protected + if individuals are better off as a result vs state of nature -> social contract + optimistic view of human nature
View of society:
'natural state' -> society precedes state due to rational, respectful human nature
as choosing to create a state, individuals must be free to pursue self-fulfilment
universal self-fulfilment is not possible without tolerance - negativefreedom or harm principle
Mill's emphasis on education to overcome minoirty conflicts caused by ignorance
View of economy:
belief in private property as a fundamental natural right
Adam Smith -> laissez-faire, free trade, private enterprise, 'invisible hand' of market forces would enrich all
'trickle down' and meritocracy - equality of opportunity if not outcome
View of the state:
rejection of pre-Enlightenment -> divine right ofkings, monarchies, hereditary power
state of law is preferable as long as natural rights advance - if threatened, state is no longer desirable
social contract + government by consent - belief in constitutional or limited state based on foundational equality (all born equal) - 'fragmented + scattered power'
democratic? complex - concerns about tyranny of majority, uneducated voters, non-property voters
some liberals propose limitations on voting rights as a result
Tyranny - all power in the hands of a single ruler
Tyranny of the majority - where the majority makes decisions that are not in the best interest of the minority