people choose a romantic partner by using a series of filters that narrow down the field of availabilities from which we might eventually make our choice
Who was the filter theory of attraction devised by?
Kerckoff and Davis
what are the three main filter's/stages prominent in different stages of partner selection?
social demography- variables such as age, background and religion determining the likelihood of individuals meeting in the first place are most likely the most important factors in initiating a relationship.
similarity in attitudes- if people share similar attitudes, values and beliefs, communication is easier so a relationship is likely to progress
Complementarity of needs- how well two people fit together and meet each other's needs, providing each other with mutual satisfaction of opposed needs
describe what's involved in social demography
refers to variables such as age, social background and geographical location
these determine the likelihood of individuals meeting in the first place
social circumstances reduce the range of people available for us to meet
fairly restricted as we are more likely to contact people from own own ethnic, social and educational groups, and those living clos to us geographically
These are the people we are similar to and more at ease with
Therefore in this stage attraction has more to do with social rather than individual characteristics
describe what is involved in similarity of attitudes
psychological characteristics- specifically the agreement on attitudes and values
Kerckoff and Davis found that similarity of attitudes was of central importance at the start of any relationship, best predictor of relationship stability
Through disclosures to each other, individuals weigh up decisions about whether or not to continue or terminate the relationship
Partners who are very different in terms of values aren't considered suitable for continuing a relationship, so are filtered from the field of possible long-term partners
Describe what is involved in complementarity of needs
People having different needs like each other more because they provide each other with mutual satisfaction of opposed needs
Finding a partner who complements ensures needs are likely to be met
Winch- studied 25 married US couples, stated that social needs (eg dominance and defence) should be more complementary than similar if marriages are to work
If one partner is low in an attribute, the other should be high in it
In long-term relationships people are attracted to people who's needs are harmonious not conflicting with their own
describe the procedure of the key study by Kerckoff and Davis
longitudinal study of 94 dating couples in US
each partner in the couple completed 2 questionnaires assessing degree to which they shared attitudes and values (Index of value consensus test)
and the degree of need complementarity (FIRO-B test)
7 months after initial testing, couples completed a further questionnaire assessing how close they felt to their partner compared to how they felt at the beginning of the study
researchers believed this would indicate progress towards permanence in the relationship
describe the findings of the key study by Kerckoff and Davis
In initial analysis of the results, only similarity appeared to be related to partner closeness.
But when the researchers divided the couples into short term and long term relationships (dating 18 mths vs dating more than 18 mths) a difference emerged
>18 mths- similarity of attitudes was the most significant predictor of how close they felt to the partner
<18mths- only complementarity of needs was predictive for how close each individual felt to their partner
evaluation of the filter theory?
😊Research by Kerckoff and Davis- longitudinal study
😊 Duck- filtering process means you can avoid investing into relationships that won't work- strategic assessment as the process allows you to be exposed to person's true feelings
☹️ Lack of research support- Levinger et al- failure to replicate- studied 330 couples, attitude similarity/complementarity of needs didn't influence progress towards permanence. Questionnaires Davis + K used outdated, lack of temporal validity
☹️ cultural bias- US couples investigated (WEIRD samples)- process could be different for non-Westerners (beta bias and imposed etic) lack of generalisation as not all relationships begin with similar social demographics, complementarity of needs may not always indicate permanence