in any experiment there will be unwanted factors which could affect the relationship between the IV and the DV, spoiling or disorting the results in the process
in experiments, we need to know the manipulation of the IV causes the DV
the key to an experiment is that an IV is manipulated to see how this affects the DV
Extraneous Variables :
additional unwanted variables that interfere with the IV (or the DV)
these variables should be controlled or removed
are usually identified at the start of the study by the researcher - takes steps to minimise their influence
Nuisance Variables :
straightforward variables which can be easily controlled
they do not vary systematically with the IV
eg age of participants or lighting in the lab
does not confound the findings of the study
make it harder to detect a result (find the task harder)
The different unwanteed factors in an experiment are :
Extraneous variables
nuisance variables
confounding variables
demand characteristics
Investigator effects
Confounding Variable :
a type of extraneous variable - not controlled at the start of the experiment
external factor in an experiment that affects both the IV and DV
can introduce bias or error
makes it difficult to determine if the observed effects are onlydue to theIV
controlling of confounding variables are essential to establish true cause and effectsrelationships
if not properly controlled, interferes with the DV
Demand Characteristics :
participants are not passive within the experiment
participants try to make sense of the new situation
participant reactivity - a significant extraneous variable that is difficult to control
clues/cues may help participants interpret the aims of the study - 'second-guess' the experimenters intentions
may look for clues on how to behave in the experimental situation - unnatural behaviour
may affect the DV
Demand Characteristics could lead to :
please-U effect
screw-U effect
please-U effect = participant act in a way that they think is expected and over perform to please the experimenter
screw-U effect = participant deliberately under performs to sabotage the results of the study
Investigator Effect :
is any unwanted influence of the investigator on the research outcome
could be a result of participant reactivity
Coolican (2006) : expectancy effect, unconscious cues, leading questions
Expectancy Effect :
present when someone expects a given result
expectations unconsciously affect the outcome of the expected results
when participant expects certain kind of outcome, they change their actions and behaviours to get that expected outcome
Unconscious Cues :
subtle, unintentional, unconscious cues - communication that provides information to another individual
verbal : speech, patterns, physical activity while speaking or tone of voice
non verbal : facial expressions and body language
Leading Questions :
questions that are worded to suggest a particular answer
lead to bias
eg 'you like it here don’t you’ - invokes a ‘yes’ response
in any investigation, there are simple steps that the researcher can take to minimise the effect of extraneous/ confounding variable’s on the outcome
randomisation is an attempt to control investigator effect (error and bias)
randomisation = the use of chance wherever possible to reduce the researcher's influence on the design of the investigation
randomisation = standardised procedures
in an experiment which involves a number of different conditions, the order and the participants should be randomly determined (randomised)
in a randomisation, a random number generator could be used
Standardisation :
all participants should be subject to the same environment, information and experience
standardised instructions are read to each participant in the experiment - followed by everyone
means non standardised changes in the procedure do not act as extraneous variables