No variables are controlled or manipulated by the researcher
Behaviour is often observed in a natural setting- everything is left as it is normally
Strengths of naturalistic observations:
Behaviour is likely to be natural. This means that ecological validity is high and findings can be generalised to real-life settings
Limitations of naturalistic observations:
Extraneous variables cannot be controlled to prevent them from becoming confounding variables. This means that cause and effect cannot be established and internal validity is low
What is a controlled observation?
Some variables are regulated by the researcher
Behaviour is often observed in a controlled laboratory setting
Strengths of controlled observations:
Extraneous variables can be controlled for to prevent them from becoming confounding variables. This means that cause and effect can be established and internal validity is high
Limitations of controlled observations:
Behaviour is likely to be unnatural. This means that ecological validity is low
What is an overt observation?
Participants are aware they are being observed by a researcher
Strengths of Overt observations:
there are less likely to be ethical issues with this observational technique because participants can give their consent to be observed
Limitations of overt observations:
Behaviour is likely to be unnatural because participants know that they are being observed and may respond to demand characteristics. This means the internal validity of findings may be low
What is a covert observation?
Participants are unaware that they are being observed by a researcher. They may be informed afterwards.
Strengths of covert observations:
Behaviour is likely to be natural because participants do not know that they are being observed. This means the internal validity of findings may be high.
Limitations of covert observations:
There are ethical issues with this observational technique because the participants have not given their consent to be observed.
What is a participant observation?
The researcher becomes a member of the group that they are observing
Strengths of a participant observation:
The researcher may pick up on small details that would otherwise be missed- special insights into the behaviour from the 'inside'
Limitations of participant observations:
The researcher may become subjective and allow their own opinions to influence their observations. This means the internal validity of their findings may be low.
What are non-participant observations?
The researcher remains outside of the group that they are observing and does not interact with the people being observed
Strengths of non-participant observations:
The researcher is more likely to remain objective and not allow their own opinions to influence their observations. This means the internal validity of their findings may be high.
Limitations of Non-participant observations:
The researcher may miss small details of the behaviour that they are observing and therefore not get a full representation of behaviour
What are the two types of observational design a researcher can use when conducting a study?
structured observation
unstructured observation
What are structured observations?
The researcher uses systems to organise their observations
These systems include:
behavioural categories
event sampling
time sampling
What are behavioural categories?
The researcher creates operationalised behavioural categories to break up the stream of behaviour
When they conduct the observation, they record tallies in the behavioural categories
Categories should be objective, cover all possible component behaviours and be mutually exclusive
What is event sampling?
The researcher records the number of times a certain behaviour occurs in a target individual or individuals e.g. counting the number of times a person smiles in a 10 minute period
What is time sampling?
The researcher records behaviours at predetermined time intervals e.g. nothing what a target individual is doing every 30 seconds or some other time interval
What is an unstructured observation?
The researcher does not use any systems to record their observations
Researchers sometimes use this approach in situations, for example, where research has not been conducted before as a kind of pilot study to see what behaviours might be recorded using a structured system
What is inter-observer reliability?
Way of assessing internal reliability in an observation
It is a means of assessing whether different observers are viewing and rating behaviour in the same way
Strong positive correlation between different observers (+0.8 or more) suggests high internal reliability
To improve reliability:
Observers should be carefully trained
Structured observation with clearly operationalised behavioural categories should be used