treatments for incurable diseases e.g. cystic fibrosis, Alzheimer's
genetic enhancement therapy - parents could select DNA that would lead to their offspring being 'transhumans' with advanced physical/intellectual/psychological powers
genetic modification of animals to provide cures or transplants for humans
genetic modification of crops to produce larger yields
Christian responses in favour of genetic engineering:
some support for genetically modified crops, given their potential regarding global hunger
practical issue in xenotransplantation (e.g. using hearts of transgenic pigs) due to the potential transmission of disease
somatic-cell therapy (intended to correct genetic disorders) generally encouraged as a responsible use of God-given skill
benefits must justify costs
Christian response OPPOSING genetic engineering:
Catholics: concern about the genetic modification of animals as it could be seen as contrary to NML
concern over germline therapy - if a mistake were to be made, the bad result would be passed down the generations; the bad effects are not necessarily foreseeable
enhancement therapy rejected by Catholics + many Protestants
humans no longer in God's image
promotes idolatry
would lead to children being viewed as a commodity rather than a gift
create a two-tier society + wealth-based discrimination
views of Fletcher over genetic engineering
did not advocate an 'anything goes' approach
proper controls to prevent abuse + exploitation must be in place - but otherwise, he viewed all techniques positively, including enhancement therapy
rules + principles based on outdated + irrelevant biblical texts should be set aside
he foresaw a time in the future when overpopulation or shortages would necessitate the genetic modification of humans to enable them to live in vastly different conditions i.e. in space