Christian responses to the rise of science

Cards (15)

  • What is deism?
    Belief in an intelligent but impersonal creator - one who creates the universe then leaves it to its own free devices
  • what does deism offer?
    a religious way of explaining the predictable nature of the universe
  • why can deism not easily be challenged by science?
    because it doesnt depend on god doing anything in the world
  • god created the universe with physical laws then…?
    left it to operate with no further intervention
  • HOWEVER, deism doesnt fit with the God of classical theism, how?
    as it doesnt allow for a personal god
  • Polkinghorne points out a limitation with deism, what is this?
    The Christian God is regarded as personal, someone with whom, through prayer, people can interact with and who is expected To care/provide for people
  • an impersonal deistic God is…?
    just an intellectual idea, it is not the same as the Christian belief in a god with whom people might have a personal relationship
  • what is existentialism based on the idea of?
    that humans create their own personal reality through the choices they make
  • the world is NOT fixed/handed to them but is…? (existentialism)
    shaped by personal decisions, this approach is clearly very different to that of science
  • Kierkegaard (earliest Christian existentialist) saw faith as what?
    a matter of personal commitment, not related to scientific facts
  • what did Tillich suggest?
    Christian beliefs and symbols need to be understood in relation to existential questions concerning the meaning/purpose of life - if they’re to be relevant to peoples lives
  • what do people choose to do?
    commit to religious beliefs and symbols for a sense of meaning and purpose
  • what does belief in God express?
    existential commitments, and is NOT related to empirical fact
  • Tillich believes that there is not a conflict between religion and science, why?
    because they’re in different categories
  • what is christianity concerned with?
    existential questions, rather than with scientific questions - there is no conflict because religion and science are two different but equally valid ways of looking at the world