unwritten rules of behaviour that are acceptable in a group or society
norms provide order and predictability in society because people want approval
those who don't follow norms with suffer disapproval
some rules are explicit and violating them may mean breaking the law
others are implicit but agreed upon as a matter of convention within a society
anyone who deviates from these norms is seen as abnormal
Evaluation of Social Norms
lacks temporal validity - what is considered socially acceptable now may not have been 50 years ago
behaviours that are numerically rare (statistically abnormal) can be socially acceptable, showing that this definition takes into account desires and reasons behind norms
social norms are defined by culture
Statistical Infrequency
descriptive statistics are used to represent a typical value in a given data set
a person's behaviour would be considered an indication of abnormality if it was found to be numerically rare
statistically rare can be defined by anything that falls outside of the normal distribution (2 standard deviations away from the mean)
Evaluation of Statistical Infrequency
real world application - all assessments of patients with mental disorders include some kind of measurement of how sever their symptoms are compared to statistical norms
however, unusual characteristics can be positive and although they are statistically abnormal, it doesn't mean they need treatment
some people don't benefit from a label as it may have a negative effect on the way others view them and the way they view themselves
Deviation from Ideal Mental Health
Jahoda (1958) conducted a review of what others had written about good mental health and these are characteristics that enable an individual to feel happy and behave competently
self-attitudes - high self esteem and sense of identity
personal growth and self actualisation
integration - being able to cope in a stressful situation
autonomy
accurate perception of reality
mastery of the environment
the absence of these criteria indicate abnormality
Evaluation of deviation for ideal mental health
criteria is bound to Western culture and North American cultures (collectivist vs individualistic cultures)
perceptions of reality change overtime
the criteria can be quite difficult to measure
the definition is comprehensive and covers a broad range of criteria for mental health services to be referred for help which suggests that its a useful tool for thinking about mental health
Failure to Function Normally
when behaviour suggests that a person can't cope with everyday living or when it causes distress
some people may lack awareness that their behaviour is wrong
there may be situations where a person is not coping with everyday life in a normal way. If this doesn't cause distress to self or others, then the person isn't considered abnormal
Rosenham and Seligman (1989)
signs that can be used to determine whether or not someone is functioning normally
when a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules (e.g. maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space)
when a person experiences severe distress
when a person's behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
Evaluation of failure to function
psychopaths can be dangerous and still appear normal (e.g. Harold Shipman)
definition suffers from cultural realism
when deciding whether someone is failing to function adequately, someone has to judge whether a patient is distressed or distressing others
The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale makes assessments as objective as possible