ethics: can withdraw any time + kept anonymous + receive full debrief
sign + date
Deception
so don't lie, but sometimes necessary to protect them
Debriefing
after study, told the true aims, further information, returns to originate state
Right to withdraw
where everyone should be aware they can leave at any point
Protection from harm
like physical, psychological on animals
Privacy
as people don't expect to be studied + observed without knowledge
Confidentiality
so no one can identify participants, anonymous
Way to go around consent
parental consent for anyone under 16
presumptive consent, ask similar demographic
prior consent
Sampling
random sampling
systematic sampling
volunteer sampling
stratified sampling
opportunity sampling
Random sampling
write list of total target population
names on paper
all names into hat
pick out name
Random sampling
+ unbiased
+ quick and easy
- unrepresentative sample by chance
Systematic sampling
use a system
every nth person
Systematic sampling
+ no researcher bias as no control
- unrepresentative sample by chance
Volunteer sampling
ask for any volunteers
Volunteer sampling
+ quick and easy
+ less dropouts
- demand characteristics
- volunteer bias
Stratified sampling
identify subgroups in total population
work out proportions
randomly select each condition based on proportions
Stratified sampling
+ representative
- more time consuming
Opportunity sampling
whoever is available
most convenient
Opportunity sampling
+ quickest and easiest method
- unrepresentative sample
- researcher bias
Independent variable
is event that is directly manipulated by an experimenter in order to test its effect on another variable
Dependent variable
is a measurable outcome of the action of the independent variable in an experiment
Operationalise
is ensuring the variables are in a form that can be easily tested
Hypotheses
non-directional
directional
null
Non-directional hypothesis
There will be a correlation between covariable 1 and covariable 2
There will be a difference between the results in condition 1 and condition 2
Directional hypothesis
There will be a positive/negative correlation between covariable 1 and covariable 2
Condition 1 will have a higher/lower result in (_?) than condition 2
Null hypothesis
There will be no correlation between covariable 1 and covariable 2
There will be no difference between the results in condition 1 and condition 2
Control variables
extraneous variable
cofounding variable
investigator effect
Extraneous variable
is any variable other than the IV that could affect the results (DV) that we should attempt to control
Cofounding variable
are any variables other than the IV that has affected the results (DV)
Investigator effect
is anything that an investigator does that affects a participant's performance in a study, other than what was intended (maybe cofounding/extraneous variable)
Experimental design
repeated measures design
independent groups design
matched pairs design
Repeated measures design
+ less participants needed
+ no participant variables
- order effects (practice gets better, boredom)
- demand characteristics
Counterbalancing
experimental technique used to overcome order effects
half the participants do the first condition then the condition, half the participants do the second condition then the first
Independent groups design
+ less demand characteristics
+ no order effects
- double participants needed
- researcher cannot control the effects of participant variables
Matched pairs design
+ no participant variables
+ avoids orders effects
- very time consuming
- not possible to match everyone
Observations
participant observation
non-participant observation
covert observation
overt observation
controlled observation
naturalistic observation
Participant observation
where researcher takes part/acts as participant in own research