Cards (4)

  • Point: One strength of socially sensitive research is that it can have benefits for the group who have been studied.
    Evidence: For example, the Kinsey report challenged stigmatisation of homosexuality, leading to its eventual removal from the DSM-1.
    Explain: This was based on anonymous interviews with thousands and men and women which revealed that homosexuality is a typical expression of human sexual behaviour.
    Link: Therefore, this suggests that tackling sensitive topics in research can lead to improved understanding and acceptance of marginalised groups.
  • Point: However, in some studies there could be negative consequences for the groups being studied.
    Evidence: For instance, research on the genetic basis of criminality has found there to be a ‘criminal gene’
    Explain: This raises ethical questions about the implications for legal responsibility as this has been used to justify murder with ‘The Mobley defence’.
    Link: Therefore, this suggests that researchers must weigh the potential benefits against the potential harm of their studies and take appropriate measures to minimise harm.
  • Another :) is that certain groups (e.g. policymakers) rely on research related to socially sensitive issues.
    Policymakers use research to inform decisions on critical social policies, such as those related to child care, education, mental health, crime and much more.
    Psychological research often relies on data collected and compiled by the Office for National Statistics, which aims to provide objective statistics about UK society.
    Therefore, this suggests that psychologists have a crucial role in influencing policy decisions by producing high-quality research on socially sensitive topics.
  • Point: One limitation is that poor research design may lead to erroneous findings with lasting impacts.
    Evidence: Despite Burt's fraudulent research, the 11+ exam continues to be used in parts of the UK.
    Explain: This indicates that flawed research can perpetuate harmful practices, even after the research's findings have been discredited.
    Link: Therefore, this suggests that researchers must prioritise rigorous research design and ethical conduct to avoid perpetuating harm, particularly in socially sensitive areas.