Save
...
Social Influence
Conformity
Conformity to social roles
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Billy Dudden
Visit profile
Cards (9)
The Stanford prison experiment (SPE)
Zimbardo
21
men (
volunteer
students) who identified as
'emotionally stable'
Prisoners
and
guards
were encouraged to
conform
to
social roles
both through their
uniforms
and the
instructions
they were given
Uniform
Prisoners
-
loose smock
and
cap.
Identified by
numbers.
Guards
-
wooden club
,
handcuffs
and
mirror shades
Created a loss of
personal identity
(called
de-individuation
) and meant they would be more likely to
conform
to
perceived roles
Instructions about behaviour
Prisoners
were further
encouraged
to
identify
with their role by several
procedures
For example, "
applying
for
parole
" instead of
leaving
the
experiment
early
Findings related to social roles
Prisoners
rebelled
within
2 days
Guards used a
'divide-and-rule'
tactic
Guards
harassed
prisoners constantly to remind them of their
powerlessness
Some showed signs of
psychological disturbance
One went on
hunger strike
'The hole'
- a
dark
,
tiny closet
Guards identified more and more closely with their role
Aggressive
,
brutal
Zimbardo
ended the experiment after only
6 days
Conclusions related to social roles
Social roles
appear to have a
strong
influence on individuals'
behaviour
- the
guards
became
aggressive
and the
prisoners
became
submissive
Even
external volunteers
(such as the
'prison chaplain'
) found themselves behaving as if they were in a
prison
rather than in a
psychological study
Control
Strength of the SPE -
Zimbardo
and his colleagues had control over
key variables
Selection
of participants -
emotionally stable
,
randomly
assigned
individuals
Allowed researchers to rule out
individual differences
The degree of control
increases
the
internal validity
of the study
Lack of realism
Limitation
- did not have
realism
of a true
prison
Banuazizi
and
Movahedi
argued the participants were merely
play-acting
rather than genuinely
conforming
to their
social roles
Participants' actions were based off
stereotypes
One
guard
even said he based his role on a
brutal character
from the film
Cool Hand Luke
Counterpoint to
Banuazizi
&
Movahedi
Mark McDermott
argued that the participants did behave as if the
prison
was
real
90
% of the prisoners'
conversations
were about
prison life
For example, talking about
'sentences'
One prisoner even said how they thought that the prison was a
real
one, but controlled by
psychologists
rather than the
government
High degree
of
internal validity
Exaggerates the power of roles
Limitation
Only
1/3
of the
guards
actually behaved in a
brutal
manner
1/3
of
guards
tried to
help
the prisoners by offering them
cigarettes
, reinstating
privileges
etc
Suggests that
Zimbardo
overstated his view that
SPE
participants were
conforming
to
social rules
and
minimised
the influence of
dispositional
factors