Conformity to social roles

Cards (9)

  • The Stanford prison experiment (SPE)
    • Zimbardo
    • 21 men (volunteer students) who identified as 'emotionally stable'
    • Prisoners and guards were encouraged to conform to social roles both through their uniforms and the instructions they were given
  • Uniform
    • Prisoners - loose smock and cap. Identified by numbers.
    • Guards - wooden club, handcuffs and mirror shades
    • Created a loss of personal identity (called de-individuation) and meant they would be more likely to conform to perceived roles
  • Instructions about behaviour
    • Prisoners were further encouraged to identify with their role by several procedures
    • For example, "applying for parole" instead of leaving the experiment early
  • Findings related to social roles
    • Prisoners rebelled within 2 days
    • Guards used a 'divide-and-rule' tactic
    • Guards harassed prisoners constantly to remind them of their powerlessness
    • Some showed signs of psychological disturbance
    • One went on hunger strike
    • 'The hole' - a dark, tiny closet
    • Guards identified more and more closely with their role
    • Aggressive, brutal
    • Zimbardo ended the experiment after only 6 days
  • Conclusions related to social roles
    • Social roles appear to have a strong influence on individuals' behaviour - the guards became aggressive and the prisoners became submissive
    • Even external volunteers (such as the 'prison chaplain') found themselves behaving as if they were in a prison rather than in a psychological study
  • Control
    • Strength of the SPE - Zimbardo and his colleagues had control over key variables
    • Selection of participants - emotionally stable, randomly assigned individuals
    • Allowed researchers to rule out individual differences
    • The degree of control increases the internal validity of the study
  • Lack of realism
    • Limitation - did not have realism of a true prison
    • Banuazizi and Movahedi argued the participants were merely play-acting rather than genuinely conforming to their social roles
    • Participants' actions were based off stereotypes
    • One guard even said he based his role on a brutal character from the film Cool Hand Luke
  • Counterpoint to Banuazizi & Movahedi
    • Mark McDermott argued that the participants did behave as if the prison was real
    • 90% of the prisoners' conversations were about prison life
    • For example, talking about 'sentences'
    • One prisoner even said how they thought that the prison was a real one, but controlled by psychologists rather than the government
    • High degree of internal validity
  • Exaggerates the power of roles
    • Limitation
    • Only 1/3 of the guards actually behaved in a brutal manner
    • 1/3 of guards tried to help the prisoners by offering them cigarettes, reinstating privileges etc
    • Suggests that Zimbardo overstated his view that SPE participants were conforming to social rules and minimised the influence of dispositional factors