prejudice and discrimination

Cards (24)

  • inter-group prejudice and conflicts
    • ethnic and racial prejudice and discrimination underlie many of the most prominent recent and contemporary conflicts
    • israelis and palestinians
    • burmese and rohingya in myanmar
  • discrimination
    • differential behaviour - directed toward another person or group based on their group membership
    • protected characteristics
    • sex
    • gender reassignment
    • sexual orientation
    • marriage
    • race
    • age
    • religion
    • pregnanct and maternaty
  • direct discrimination: when someone is at a disadvantage or treated less favourable because of a protected characteristics
    indirect discrimination: when a policy that applies to anyone has a worse effect due to protected characteristic
  • more subtle forms of discrimination
    reluctance to help
    • failure to help others improve their position
    tokenism
    • small or trivial positive act towards marginalised group member
    reverse discrimination
    • more extreme version of tokenism
  • prejudgment
    - formed without adequate consideration of relevant evidence, especially an unfavourable judgement based on group membership
    • a prejudice is a type of social attitude - affective component
    • supported by stereotypes
  • stereotypes
    • an overgeneralised belief about the characteristics of a particular group that is applied to most members of the group
    • imgaes of various types of people we carry around in our head
    cognitive process
    • stereotypes can bias attention because people often look for information that will confirm a stereotype
  • stereotypes are beliefs about the characteristics of a group
  • prejudice is a positive or negative feeling towards a group
  • discrimination is a behaviour - treating someone differently based on their group membership
  • targets of prejudice
    • sex
    • race
    • age
    • ethnicity
    particularly potent when:
    • category is vivid and omnipresent
    • occupy lower positions in society
  • explicit vs implicit
    • dual processing - the brain processes thoughts, memories, and attitudes on two different tracks - dual processing
    • processing is explicit - on the radar screen of our awareness
    • implicit - an unthinking knee - jerk response operating below the radar, leaving us unaware of how attitudes influence our behaviour
    • unconscious prejudices can lead to discrimination
  • charlesworth and banaji study on change and stability over time of implicit and explicit attitudes
    • over 13 years
    • six social groups: sexual orientation, race, skin tone, age, disability and body weight
    • explicit bias decreased in all six
    • implicit decreased on some (sex orientation, race, skin tone)
    • implicit was unchanged on others (age, disability)
    • Implicity increased on body weight
  • racism
    over racism - blatant, explicit and generally unmistakeable - illegal, socially censored and more difficult to find
    modern racism: covert or symbolic opposition to policies designed to help a specific racial group, arising from hidden prejudice
  • modern racism scale (McConahay
    7 likert scale items
    • ' discrimination against blacks is no longer a problem in the US
    • it is easy to understand the anger of black people in america
    very culturally and temporally specific
    • relates to one racially marginalised group
  • Implicit prejudice operates unconsciously and unintentionally
    – Use subtle, indirect techniques to measure it (e.g., quickly pair a person’s image with a trait)– Implicit Association Test (IAT)
    – Introduced by Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz
    – Attracted a huge amount of research
    – Test cannot be faked like other attitude scales
  • IAT - racial bias
    first round
    • ppts asked to use 2 buttons on keyboard to identify a series of faces that flash on the screen as black or white and a series of words that flash on screen (e.g. happy, peace, agony, hurt)
    subsequent rounds
    • participants presented with images of faces of black and white people mixed with good and bad words
  • IAT - racial bias
    • this does not causes conflict for those who favour whites over black
    • congruent with stereotype
  • IAT - racial bias
    • difference between reaction times and errors provides a measure of the implicit attitude
    • because it can't be faked, it is thought to be especially useful for measuring implicit prejudice
    • knowles et al: IAT scores predicted opposition to obama
    • also been used to look at implicit attitudes to body weight
  • IAT
    • considerable heterogeneity and difficulty to draw strong conclusions
    • minimal evidence of racial bias in physicians
    • greenwald et al find that implicit associations do not strongly predict prejudice, but the effects are large enough to explain discriminatory impacts
  • micro-aggressions: subtle and stunning
    • pathologizing difference: e.g. ridiculing or considering cultural differences inferior
    • denigrating and pigeonholing: accusing PoC of cheating because they obtain 95% an exam
    • colour blindness
    • excluding or rendering invisible "where were you born"
  • micro-aggressions: subtle and stunning
    future directions
    • disaggregating ethnic group experiences
    • extern to other white-dominated contexts
    • intersections with gender
  • sexism
    • historically and cross-culturally, men have held more resources, power and status than women
    • the global gender gap score in economic participation and opportunity stood at 67.7%
    • if progress toward gender equality continues at the same pace, it will take until 2095 to completely close this gap
  • ambivalent sexism: is characterised by 2 components
    • hostile sexism _ negative, resentful beliefs towards women who pose a threat to the gender hierarchy
    • benevolent sexism - a set of interrelated attitudes that tend to view women in a stereotypical way (e.g. innocent, caring, pure fragile) that are subjectively positive in feeling
  • a systematic review of ambivalent sexism
    • more evidence for effectiveness at reducing hostile than benevolent sexism
    • few studies overall
    • experimental interventions to reduce sexism and implicit prejudice remain rare