Aims to understand behaviour through unbiased, standardised methods than can be replicated and results generalised
Define the idiographic side of the debate
The idiographic approach focuses on understanding individuals, emphasising their unique experiences
what methods does the idiographic approach use
Qualitative methods - case studies, unstructured interviews
Why is the idiographic approach subjective
Aims to understand the unique subjective experience of the individual person, rather than uncovering general laws
Is the Cognitive approach idiographic or nomothetic? Why?
Mainly nomothetic
aims to uncover universal cognitive processes that apply to all humans
researchers look for general principles or patterns of thinking
there are idiographic elements e.g. when cognitive psychologists explore how unique experiences or neuropsychological conditions (brain injury) influence cognitive functioning
Is the biological approach nomothetic or idiographic? Why?
Nomothetic
emphasises that all humans share certain biological mechanisms like brain structure and genetic inheritance
large sample, quantitative research methods e.g. twin studies or brain imaging studies
Is the behaviourist approach nomothetic or idiographic? Why?
Nomothetic
seeks to uncover general laws of behaviour that can be applied universally e.g. classical and operant conditioning
controlled lab experiments with a large sample
Is the psychodynamic approach idiographic or nomothetic? Why?
Mainly idiographic
Freud uses case studies of his patients to understand human behaviour e.g. little hans
Emphasises unique influence of early childhood experiences and repressed memories
Claimed he has identified universal laws of behaviour and personality development however theses are still idiographic because they were drawn from unique experiences
Is the humanistic approach idiographic or nomothetic? Why?
Idiographic
concerned with investigating unique experiences rather than producing general laws of behaviour
rogers emphasised that each person experiences and feelings should be understood in the context of their unique life circumstances
Limitations of the nomothetic approach
cannot find out rich / in-depth information about single cases
Less meaningful as tends to use quantitative methods