Offer

Cards (80)

  • what is an offer?
    An offer is a proposal (a promise) showing a willingness to contract on firm and definite
    terms.
  • What case is used to determine whether a offer unilateral or bilateral?
    Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Co
  • What characteristic must an offer have in its terms to be valid?
    It must be definite
  • Why are words such as "might be prepared" generally not considered an offer in contract law?
    They lack definiteness
  • In Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979], what phrase used by the council was deemed not to be an offer?
    "We may be prepared to sell"
  • In the case of Gibson v Manchester City Council, who made the offer that the council could then accept or reject?
    The tenant
  • What legal principle is illustrated by the Harvey v Facey [1893] case?
    A request for information is not an offer
  • In Harvey v Facey [1893], what did Harvey ask Facey in his initial message?
    Will you sell me Bumper Hall Pen?
  • In Harvey v Facey [1893], what was Facey's reply to Harvey's question?
    Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen £900
  • Why was Facey's reply in Harvey v Facey not considered an offer?
    It was a response to a request for information
  • Who can make an offer, according to contract law?
    Anyone
  • In Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking, what action by Thornton constituted acceptance of the offer?
    Putting money in the machine
  • In Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971], who was deemed to have made the offer?
    The owner of the car park
  • To whom can an offer be made?
    An individual, a group, or the world
  • What type of offer is made when offering a reward for finding a lost dog?
    An offer to the world at large
  • What does ITT stand for in contract law?
    Invitation to treat
  • What is the main difference between an offer and an invitation to treat?
    An ITT cannot be accepted
  • What is an invitation to treat?
    An indication of willingness to negotiate
  • What does an invitation to treat invite the other person to do?
    Make an offer
  • In Fisher v Bell [1961], why was the shopkeeper not guilty of offering a flick knife for sale?
    The window display was an ITT
  • According to Fisher v Bell [1961], what is a window display considered in contract law?
    An invitation to treat
  • What is the general rule regarding advertisements in contract law?
    They are an invitation to treat
  • In Partridge v Crittenden [1968], why was the newspaper advertisement not considered an offer?
    It was merely an invitation to treat
  • What was advertised in Partridge v Crittenden [1968]?
    Bramblefinch cocks and hens
  • In what type of contract is an advertisement more likely to be considered an offer?
    Unilateral contract
  • Under what conditions might an advertisement be considered an offer rather than an invitation to treat?
    If customer acts upon clear terms
  • In Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Stores, why was the advertisement considered an offer?
    It required certain terms fulfilled
  • In Lefkowitz v Great Minneapolis Stores, what was the specific term that the customer fulfilled, leading the court to consider the advert as an offer?
    Being one of the first customers
  • In auctions, what action is considered an invitation to treat?
    Inviting bids
  • In auctions, what action constitutes an offer?
    Making a bid
  • In BCA v Wright [1972], what action by the auctioneer was confirmed as acceptance?
    Banging his hammer
  • In auctions, what action signifies acceptance of a bid?
    Banging the hammer
  • When can an offer be accepted?
    While it is open
  • When does an offer come into existence?
    When communicated to the offeree
  • What condition must be met for a person to accept an offer?
    Knowing of its existence
  • What is revocation of an offer?
    Withdrawal
  • When can an offer be revoked?
    Any time before acceptance
  • How must revocation be made effective?
    It must be communicated
  • Can revocation be communicated by a third party?
    Yes
  • What was the key issue in Byrne v van Tienhoven [1880] regarding revocation?
    Revocation must be communicated