Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.
Asch (1951) devised what is now regarded as a classic experiment in social psychology, whereby there was an obvious answer to a line judgment task.
If the participant gave an incorrect answer it would be clear that this was due to group pressure.
Asch used a lab experiment to study conformity, whereby 50 male students from Swarthmore College in the USA participated in a vision test.
In Asch's study, there were seven confederates/stooges in the room, each with a different answer to the line judgment task.
The real participant in Asch's study sat at the end of the row and gave his or her answer last.
There were 18 trials in total, and the confederates gave the wrong answer on 12 trials, called the critical trials.
Asch measured the number of times each participant conformed to the majority view.
On average, about one third (32%) of the participants who were placed in Asch's situation went along and conformed with the clearly incorrect majority on the critical trials.
Over the 12 critical trials, about 75% of participants conformed at least once, and 25% of participants never conformed.
In the control group, with no pressure to conform to confederates, less than 1% of participants gave the wrong answer.
Asch's study found that people conform for two main reasons: because they want to fit in with the group (normative influence) and because they believe the group is better informed than they are (informational influence).
Asch's study used a biased sample, with all participants being male students who all belonged to the same age group.
The study lacks population validity and the results cannot be generalized to females or older groups of people.
Asch's experiment used an artificial task to measure conformity - judging line lengths.
The study has low ecological validity and the results cannot be generalized to other real-life situations of conformity.
Asch replied that he wanted to investigate a situation where the participants could be in no doubt what the correct answer was.
The high levels of conformity found by Asch were a reflection of American, 1950's culture and told us more about the historical and cultural climate of the USA in the 1950s than they do about the phenomena of conformity.
Asch's study raised ethical issues, as participants were not protected from psychological stress which may occur if they disagreed with the majority.
Evidence that participants in Asch-type situations are highly emotional was obtained by Back et al. (1963) who found that participants in the Asch situation had greatly increased levels of autonomic arousal.
Asch also deceived the student volunteers claiming they were taking part in a 'vision' test; the real purpose was to see how the 'naive' participant would react to the behavior of the confederates.
Deception was necessary to produce valid results in Asch's study.