The Multi-Store Model has separate, unitary stores for each type of memory
The Multi-Store Model has a linear and sequential flow of information which is transferred by attention and rehearsal
The Multi-Store Model shows that memory works through Aquisition, Storage, and Retrieval
Atkinson & Shiffrin proposed the MSM
The Multi-Store Model is basic and not broad enough
Glanzer & Cunitz supported the MSM by proving the idea of STM and LTM being two separate stores
Glanzer & Cunitz presented participants with lists of words to remember and observed the serial position effect (more likely to remember first and last words)
When Glanzer & Cunitz introduced a distraction, only the last words were affected
Glanzer & Cunitz observed the Primacy and Recency Effect
Patient HM supports the MSM because he was unable to transfer new information to LTM but had the normal digit span for STM
Clive Wearing's case goes against the MSM because he could still access his procedural memory (piano) but most of his episodic memory apart from his wife were gone
Clive Wearing's case shows that the MSM is over-simplified as there are different types of LTM
Brown and Kulik proposed the idea of Flashbulb Memories
A Flashbulb Memory is a highly vivid and detailed 'snapshot' of a moment where consequential and emotionally arousing news was learned
Flashbulb memories undermine the MSM because they show that emotional memories do not require rehearsal as they are resistant to forgetting
Craik & Lockhart proposed the Levels of Processing model with shallow, intermediate, and deep levels of processing