forgetting- by displacemement if info entered into the sts faster than can be transferred to ltm otherwise by decay
long term store
capcity + duration- limitless
encoding- semantic
forgetting occur by decay
rehearsal maintains info in stm
retrieval- may use several mechanisms
strength of MSM
Glanzer and cunitz supports notion of n ltm and stm store as well as the importance of reheasral via how primacy effect occurs due to rehearsal of the first words that are then transferred into the ltm
and how recency effect occurs because those are the last words to be presented
weakness of MSM
soem case study evidence challenges single ltm store `
clive wearing had different types of ltm for different things e.g. proceudural for skills and stores for remembering biographical info
Aswell as this KF could still add memories to ltm even though his stm was damaged.
MSM doesnt explain this but his condition supports wmm
strength of case studies
can give insight into how something works when it is functioning correclty such as brain damage on memory
case study on KF whos stm was impaired following a accident but his ltm was still intact suggesting seperate physicial stores in the brain
the detail collected on a case study may lead to findings that conflict with current theories and stimulate new paths for research
weakness of case studies
unusual by nature so have poor reliability as replicating them exactly will be unlikely
due to sample size its unlikely findings from a case study alone can be generalised to a whole pop
working memory model
baddeley and hitch developed the idea of wmm to replace the idea of a unitary stm
this model says stm is more active and complex
wmm suggests stm can comlete 2 different tasks at the same time
central executive
controls the other slave components
has a limited capacity
decides what the wmm pays attention to and it can ahndle more than one task at once
visuo spatial sketchpad
holds visual memories
limited capacity
used for spatial tasks
phonological loop
limited capacity
deals with acoustic info
two parts:
phonological store-sound based info and duraion of 2 seconds
articulatory loop- linked to speech production. rehearse and stoe speech collected. repeated in a loop
episodic buffer
links info across different slave systems to bring together type of info from other components
temporary storage with limited capacity
strength of wmm
baddeley and hitch dual task experiment
we can do 2 diff tasks that take up space in diff stores
when asked to complete a task using the articulatory loop and seperate task in ce recall isnt effected
however 2 similar tasks bith in the AL recall is affected
Weakness of the wmm
The Ce doesnt explain very much
baddeley suspects the ce consists of seperate sub components
this means that working memory has not been fully explained beacyse the ce still needs to be more specified
Episodic and semantic memory
tulving suggested that the msms view of long term memory was too simplisti
he argued there are at least 2 ltm systems containing different types of information
episodic memory
ability to recall events/episodes from our lives
timestamped- you remember when they happened
multiple elements- one episode includes several elements interwoven to produce a single memory
semantic memory
stores our knowledge of the world
language- relies on semantic memory because it stores organised knowledge of words as well as the underlying concepts
mental representation of things that are not present
less vulnerable to forgetting
not time stamped
shared facts
strength for episodic and semantic memory
HMs episodic memory was impaired but his semantic memory was relatively unaffected
this supports tulvings view that there are different memory stores in LtM
weakness of episodic and semantic memory
a major weakness is lack of control over variables in case studies
studies involve people who have experienced unexpected brain damage so the researcher has no knowledge of the patients memory before the damage `
lack of control reduces validity and limits what such studies can tell us about types of LTM
reonctructive memory
bartlett argued that memories are reconstrucions because memory is an active process in which we sstore fragments of information
we store framgments and when we try to recall something we build (reconstruct) fragments into a meaningful whole
bartlett war of the ghosts
pps read a american folk tale ware of the ghoosts and reproduced it 15 mins later
bartlett showed the new version to another person who reproduced it a short time later
he repeated this chain with further participants
the story changed became shorter through leaving out unfamiliar details
reconstructions were not random but made the story mmore conventional coherent and meaningul to the pps
schema theory
a mental package of knowledge
for example think of words associated with a bank robbery these reoresent your bank robbery schema
during everyday experiences the relevant xhema is activated
the schema allows us to process information about the situation more efficiently
schemas can be changed by new knowledge and experiences
schemas and memory
encoding- new knowledhe that conflicts with an existing schema might not be encoded in the first place because it doesnt fit with what you expect
retrieval later on you might recall only these elements of the mempry that fit the relevent schema
this is what happened in bartletts study because the foreign nature of the story meant large parts of it didnt match the british pps schemas
Strength of recontructive memory
Bartletts findings and the theory based on them are more relevent to real life processes
weakness of reconstructive memory
bartletts research did nt use rigorously controlled methods and lacked objectivity
for example instructions were not standardised so the pps experiences of the procedure were inconsistent making it ard to compare reproductions
this means the evidence underlying reconstructive memory lacks credibility
The multi-store model describes memory as consisting of 3 basic stores: a sensory register, short-term store and long term store.
If attended to, sensory information moves into the STM for temporary storage, which will be encoded visually (as an image) or acoustically (as a sound).
Research to support the MSM comes from Glazer and Cunitz. They came up with the serial position effect. The primacy effect showed the tendency to recall the first few items in a list) and the recency effect
showed the tendency to remember the first few items in a list. People tend not to remember the items in the middle of the list. This demonstrates the difference between STM and LTM because people
remembered words from 2 separate memory stores and often forgot the words in the middle of the list as the MSM suggested.
The main criticism of the MSM is that it oversimplifies something as complex as human memory in to a basic model. This model cannot possibly account for all aspects of human memory, such as our
performance on dual task performances. Later models such as the working memory model may therefore be more appropriate in explaining human memory.
The MSM was a useful model of the memory system in its day. It encapsulated many research findings describing the nature of memory and the processes that connect them. However, further research established that the model is over-simplified- e.g. there is more than one type of STM and LTM and more than one type of rehearsal. However, the MSM finally gave way to the WMM which was able to accommodate these findings more successfully.
Baddeley and Hitches' working memory model explains how short term memory is organised and how it functions.