stats show real differences in the rates of offending
crime is a result of relative deprivation, subcultures and marginalisation
Marginalisation:
racism has led to the marginalisation and economic exclusion of ethnic minorities
face higher levels of unemployment, poverty and poor housing
Relative deprivation:
media's emphasis on consumerism promotes a sense of relative deprivation by setting materialistic goals - minorities are unable to achieve by legitimate means.
cannot explain the differences in minorities in terms of police racism. - police would have to be selective in their racism for it tp be the cause of differences in racism
Astructural view:
relative deprivation leads to utilitarian crime
marginalisation can lead to non-utilitarian crime - turn to violence to release frustration
Criticisms:
Asian rates are less likely than Blacks but not because they are less likely to offend. Blacks = dangerous. Asians = passive
since 9/11 police regard Asians as dangerous which led to an increase in Asian crime rate