assumption 2: animals and humans learn in the same way
assumption 3: the mind is irrelevant
classical conditioning is learning through association
operant conditioning is learning through consequence
pavlov (1927): showed how dogs can be conditioned through association
associated the sound of a bell (NS) with food (UCS) producing salivation response every time they heard the sound
skinner (1953): operant conditioning
used a rat box and every time the rat activated a lever, it was rewarded a food pellet
positive reinforcement is when a desirable outcome is received in response to an action e.g. praise from a teacher for doing revision
negative reinforcement is when an undesirable outcome is removed as a result of an action e.g. when a student hands i an essay to not be told off or get a detention
punishment is an unpleasant consequence of behaviour, decreases the likelihood that behaviour will be repeated
watson and raynor (1920): little albert - to understand whether classical conditioning could be applied directly to humans
associated a white rat with a loud bang
little albert showed the same scared response to white fluffy objects
generalisation is when similar stimuli produce the same response
discrimination is when similar stimulus stop producing the same response when withheld
extinction is when the learning fades over time without the pairing of the CS
spontaneous recovery is when the CR appears suddenly after a period of absense
higher order conditioning is where association between a new CS and the original CS is made