Save
...
unit 2
3.2
evaluation for sociological theories
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Aleena Byju
Visit profile
Cards (16)
strengths for
Durkheim's
functionalism
theory
recognises that
crime
can have a positive function
limitations for
Durkheim's
functionalism
theory
crime is not functional for victims
does not specify how much is the right amount of
deviance
strengths for
Merton's functionalism
theory
shows how how normal and
deviant
behaviour arise from the same goals
explains
statistical
patterns
likes
property crime
is high because society values wealth
limitations for
Merton's functionalism
theory
focuses on
utilitarian
crime and ignores crimes with econocmic motive
over predicts
working class
crime
ignores group deviance
strengths of
Cloward and Ohlin's
subcultural theory
subculture
offers people solutions
different neighbourhoods have goals for different illegitimate opportunites
strength's of
Cloward and Ohlin's
subcultural theory
ignores crime committed by the
wealthy
assumes everyone wants to achieve
mainstream goals
subcultures
are not always consisted of people with same characteristics
strengths of
interactionism
and
labelling theory
shows law is not fixed but a social construct
shows importance of selective
law enforcement
shows how controlling deviance can lead to more deviance
limitations of
interactionism
and
labelling theory
implies that once labelled a
deviant
career is not avoidable
gives
offenders
and a
victim
status while ignoring real victims
fails to explain why certain
groups
are labelled but not others
fails to explain why people commit
crime
even before being labelled
strengths of
Marxist theory
shows how
poverty
and
inequality
can cause
working class
crime
shows how
capitalism
promotes
greed
show how law can be biased
limitations of
Marxist
theory
not all capitalist societies have high
crime rates
like
Japan
exaggerates working class crime
only focuses on class rather than other inequalities
strengths of
right realism
studies
support
RCT
Feldman
says is rewards are high the crime is worth committing
studies show risk is an important factor
explains
opportunistic
crimes
limitations of
right realism
unclear if all criminals think this way
some crimes are
impulsive
being under the influence will not be able to
weight
out risk
strengths
of
left realism
draws attentions of importance of
relative deprivation
shows reality of
street crime
limitations of
left realism
ignores
crimes of the powerful
exaggerates
working class
crime
makes crime appear a greater problem than it is
strengths of surveillance theories
stimulated research like the electronic Panopticon
other surveillance being identified
limitations of
surveillance theories
some people resist
control
does not always change people's
behaviour