Aquinas says that killing in self-defence is justified as long as it wasn't intended and was an unavoidable result of the amount of necessary force it took to save your own life
killing in self-defence has two effects: you are alive, and you have killed someone
The defence must be proportional to the harm caused by the offence.
When unnecessary violence is used, it is an unlawful action
Louis Pojman (1935-2005) said that Aquinas's position and the natural moral law tradition are in absolute
The doctrine of double effect has was put together as a neat algorithm for solving moral disputes in which an act has two effects: one good and one bad
The doctrine of double effect:
The nature of the act condition
The means-end condition
The right-intention condition
The proportionality condition
The nature of the act condition:
Action must be morally good or indifferent/ neutral
Lying/ intentionally killing an innocent person are never morally permissible
The means-end condition
The bad effect must not be the means by which the good effect is achieved
E.g. Robin Hood's actions are unlawful
The right intention condition:
The intention must only be to achieve the good effect
The bad effect must exist as an unintended side-effect
The proportionality condition:
The good effect must be equal in importance to the bad effect
e.g. giving children vaccines and hurting them prevents them from getting diseases
Proportionalism states that in a sufficiently unusual situation it might be right to ignore a rule