(13) Peer Review -psychological research+Economy

    Cards (25)

    • peer review ensures that any research intended for publication is of high quality
    • peer review is the assessment of scientific work by other who are specialists in the same field
    • the aim of psychology is to :
      • produce a body of knowledge through conducting research
      • how this knowledge is communicated within the scientific community and to the wider public
    • in psychology research findings are published through :
      • conferences
      • textbooks
      • via academic journals
    • before a piece of research can become part of a journal, it must be subject to a process of peer review
    • peer review involves all aspect of the written investigation being scrutinised by a small group of usually two or three experts (peers) in the particular field
    • experts undergoing the peer review should be objective and unknown to the author or researcher
    • The main aims of Peer Review :
      • to allocate research funding
      • to validate the quality and relevance of research
      • to suggest amendments and improvements
    • To allocate research funding - peer review aim :
      • used to decide whether or not to award funding for proposed research project
      • may be coordinated by government run funding organisations (eg medical research council)
      • vest interest to establish research projects, provide cure, treatments, explanation for treatments
    • To validate the quality and relevance of research- peer review aim :
      • all elements of research are assessed for quality and accuracy
      • formulation of hypothesis, methodology chosen, the statistical testing and conclusions drawn
    • To suggest amendments or improvements - peer review aim :
      • may suggest minor revisions of the work
      • suggest way to improve report
      • extreme cases = may conclude that the work is inappropriate for publication and should be withdrawn
    • Benefits of Peer Review :
      • establishes the validity and accuracy or research
    • Criticism of Peer Review :
      • anonymity
      • publication bias
      • burying around - breaking research
    • Anonymity :
      • usual practice that the ''peer'' doing the review remains anonymous - likely to produce a more honest appraisal
      • minority of peers may use their anonymity to criticise rival researchers - perceive have crossed them in the past
      • likely true - researchers are in direct competition for limited research funding
      • some journals favour system of open reviewing - names of reviewer(s) made public
    • Publication Bias - criticism of peer review:
      • natural tendency for editors to publish significant 'headline grabbing' findings to increase the credibility and circulation of their publication
      • prefer to publish positive results - file drawer problem
      • could mean research does not meet criteria is ignored or disregarded
      • creates false impression of the current state of psychology
    • File Drawer Porblem :
      • refers to selective reporting of scientific findings
      • tendency of researchers to publish positive results much more readily than negative results
      • negative results - ends up in researchers drawer
    • Burying ground breaking research - criticism of peer review :
      • may suppress opposition to mainstream theories
      • wish to maintain status quo within particular scientific fields
      • be especially critical of research that contradicts their own - more favourable to that which matches it
      • established scientists - more likely to be chosen as reviewers
      • so likely findings that agree with current opinion are more likely to be passed than new and innovative research that challenges the established order
      • may have effect of slowing down the rate of change - refute validity of new research
    • one wider concern of psychology is what the implications of research are for the economy
    • implications = whether the findings of psychological research are beneficial or devalue the economic prosperity
    • Bowlby claimed that a child can only ever form a secure and lasting mono tropic bond with their mother - childcare is mothers responsibility / father provides income
    • research into attachment theory has led to findings that a child can form multiple attachments
    • as a child can form multiple attachments :
      • father is equally valuable in the child’s upbringing as the mother
      • both parents are equally capable of providing emotional support
    • Economy Benefits - multiple attachments :
      • Responsibility can be shared
      • both parent can work
      • opens up more jobs for nurseries
      • maximises household income + national economy
      • positive multiplier effect
    • Implications on economy :
      • attachments research
      • development of treatments for mental illness
    • treatement for mental illness - economy :
      • a third of absences caused by mild to moderate mental health disorders - depressions, anxiety, stress
      • research into treatment - plays important role in supporting a healthy workforce
      • treatment of mental disorders - able to have their conditions diagnosed quickly - gain quick access to treatment
      • could involve referrals to GPs
      • sufferers can manage their conditions effectively and return to work - maximise income
    See similar decks