lack of statutory definitions have enabled judges to be creative
sentencing is illogical
”wounding” seems too minor
AR & MR do not correspond
What are three things the Law Commission has criticised the OAP Act 1861?
complicated,obscure and old fashioned language
complicated and technical structure
completeunintelligibility to the lay person
what are three pieces of evidence for language problems in the OAP 1861?
language is inconsistent with expectations of lay people
key terms are not explained in the act
language is out of date
give a case for judges being too creative?
Ireland
What case shows that wounding is too minor?
Eisenhower
Explain using Eisenhower why wounding seems to minor
eisenhower defines wounding as breaking two layers of the skin. This can be minor but given it is not art of s.20 and s.18 we would expect it to be equivalent to GBH