The effects of living in an institutional setting such as an orphanage or hospital
Rutter et al (2011)
Studied a group of 165 Romanian orphans who had been adopted by families in the UK
Assessed physical,cognitive and emotional development at 4, 6, 11, 15 and 22 years
what kind of study did Rutter do?
longitudinal
Rutter - findings
hAlf of the adoptees had delayedintellectualdevelopment
mean IQ of children adopted after critical period was 77
ADHD was more common in 15-25 year olds
children adopted after 6 months showed disinhibited attachment
symptoms of disinhibited attachment
attention seeking
clinginess
indiscriminate social behaviour
key effects of institutionalisation
disinhibited attachment
intellectual disability
Zeanah et al
conducted strange situation on 95 Romanian orphans aged 12-31 months
44% of the Romanian children showed disinhibited attachment compared to 20% in the control group who never lived in an institution
strengths of romanian orphan studies
real world applications - understanding effects of institutionalisation led to improvements of care for children in orphanages + institutional care is now avoided
Few confounding variables - most children were given up by loving families due to financial reasons
weaknesses of romanian orphan studies
some confounding variables - some orphans also suffered physical neglect and lack of intellectual stimulation, not just emotional neglect - findings may be due to poor institutional care rather than just the setting
lack of data from ppts adult life - raises questions about the long term impacts of institutionalisation eg. mental health, relationships, parenthood