DEINDIVIDUATION

Cards (10)

  • WHAT IS DEINDIVIDUATION?
    • psychological state where self-awareness is lost
    • via being part of a large group, disguising appearance or drugs and alcohol
    • lose individual identity and gains social identity of group
    • Le Bon: anonymity, suggestibility, contagion (behaviour from one crowd participant spreading to another)
  • EVALUATION?
    + Dodd
    + Zimbardo
    + Watson
    + Malmouth and Check
    + Johnson and Downing
    + real world application
    -Dabbs et al
    -cultural factors
  • DODD?
    • 229 undergraduate psychology students
    • 'if you could do anything and not be held responsible what would you do?'
    • 36% antisocial
    • 26% criminal
  • ZIMBARDO?
    • female participants
    • told being investigated on creativity under stress
    • gave shocks to confederates
    • half wore coats with hoods and addressed as a group
    • half wore name tag, own clothes and addressed by name
    • in cubicles to prevent peer pressure
    • longer duration of shocks for deindividuated
  • WATSON?
    • 23 societies
    • warriors
    • in those with high killing, torture and mutilations rate 12/13 changed appearance before going to war
    • in those with low only 3/10 changed their appearance
  • MALMOUTH AND CHECK?
    • North America
    • university students
    • 'would you rape if nobody ever found out?'
    • 35% said yes
  • JOHNSON AND DOWNING?
    • female participants
    • either dressed as KKK member (mask over face), nurse or own clothes
    • gave electric shocks to confederates
    • those dressed as KKK gave higher levels of shock
    • nurses gave fewer, lower level shocks and were more compassionate
    • suggesting normative cues determine whether aggression or prosocial behaviours are demonstrated
  • REAL WORLD APPLICATION?
    when uniform is appropriate, e.g. prisons have been allowing prisoners to wear own normal clothes to prevent deindividuation
  • DABBS ET AL?
    higher testosterone levels found in violent criminals rather than non-violent criminals
  • CULTURAL FACTORS?
    • difference in anti-social behaviour between football games and rugby/ cricket games
    • cultural factors internalised by social learning