judicial precedent

Cards (20)

  • what are the types of judicial precedent?
    types
    • original precedent
    • binding precedent
    • persuasive precedent
  • original precedent
    when there are no cases before with similar facts and a new precedent is made
  • example of original precedent
    Donoghue v Stevenson - negligence
  • binding precedent
    where a court of appellate jurisdiction has made a ruling on a case, lower courts must follow it where the case is of a similar nature
  • example of binding precedent
    Daniels v White - chemicals in lemonade following Donoghue v Stevenson's notion of negligence (stare decisis)
  • persuasive precedent
    decisions that are not binding but, may pursuade a judge to follow them
  • persuasive precedents example
    decisions made in other countries, dissenting judgements, decisions made by the Privy counsel
  • key features of judicial precedent
    features:
    • clear court hierarchy
    • ratio decidendi / obiter dicta
    • an accurate system of law reporting
  • clear court hierarchy
    hierarchy
    1. supreme court
    2. court of appeal
    3. divisional court of the high court
    4. courts of first instance (ie county/magistrates)
  • ratio decidendi/obiter dicta
    reason for decision and other comments
  • accurate report system
    the incorporated council of law reporting set up in 1865
  • what are the methods of avoiding judicial precedent?
    methods
    • distinguishing
    • overruling
    • the practice statement 1966
  • distinguishing
    can be used by all courts, where judges find material facts of the case are sufficiently different from previous case decisions that it is not reasonable to follow it.
  • example of distinguishing
    R v Brown and others- activities likened to torture / R v Wilson- activities likened to tattooing
  • overruling
    used by the supreme court, where in later case states that the legal rule decided in earlier case was wrong
  • overruling example
    Davis v Johnson/ Pepper v Hart-
    The House of Lords departed from Davis v Johnson and took a purposive approach to interpretation holding that Hansard may be referred to and the teacher was not required to pay tax on the perk he received.
  • The Practice Statement 1966
    only used by supreme court, whereby they can depart from a previous decision 'when it appeals right to do so'
  • example of the Practice Statement 1966
    Lynch v DPP for NI / R v Howe- duress is no defence to murder
  • advantages of judicial precedent
    advantages
    • certainty
    • consistency and fairness
    • precision
    • flexibility
    • original precedents
  • disadvantages of judicial precedent
    disadvantages
    • rigidity
    • complexity
    • volume
    • illogical decisions
    • slow rate of growth