Cards (22)

  • cognitive explanation
    assumes that criminals think and process information in a different way to non-criminals
  • 2 areas of the cognitive explanation
    • level of moral reasoning
    • cognitive distortions
  • morals
    our sense of right and wrong within a particular culture
  • features of having morals
    • understanding society’s rules
    • learning how to behave according to the rules
    • learning the feelings that accompany behaviour
  • 3 levels of moral reasoning
    • pre-conventional morality
    • conventional morality
    • post-conventional morality
  • stages of pre-conventional morality 

    • punishment orientation - whether or not the act will lead to punishment
    • reward orientation - what is to be gained / rewarded
  • stages of conventional morality
    • good boy / girl orientation - what others expect
    • social order orientation - obedience to authority
  • stages of post-conventional morality
    • social contract & individual rights orientation - what is moral rather than legally right
    • conscience orientation - own ethical principles
  • Kohlberg (1968)
    • longitudinal study for over 12 years
    • American males
    • Given moral dilemmas
    • Found that participants progressed through the stages of moral reasoning in a fixed order, and never went back to the previous stage
  • what level of moral reasoning are offenders most likely to be in?
    pre-conventional
  • what is the pre-conventional level characterised by
    a need to avoid punishment and gain rewards - associated with child-like reasoning
  • Gudjonsson & Sigurdsson (2007)
    used an offending motivation questionnaire to assess 130 male young offenders in Iceland
    • 38% didn’t consider consequences
    • 36% were confident they wouldn’t get caught
    supports Kohlberg’s theory
  • cognitive distortions
    Faulty, biased, irrational ways of thinking, meaning we perceive ourselves and other people in a way that doesn’t match reality
  • what do cognitive distortions allow offenders to do
    deny or rationalise their criminal behaviour
  • hostile attribution bias
    tendency to misinterpret or misread other people’s actions as aggressive or threatening which may trigger a disproportionate and often violent response
  • Schonenberg & Jusyte
    presented violent offenders with images of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions
    • violent offenders were more likely to perceive the expressions as angry and hostile
  • Orobio de Castro et al
    meta analysis of 41 attribution studies
    • concluded that hostile attribution bias has a very strong relationship with aggressive behaviour
  • minimalisation
    attempt to downplay the seriousness off an offence and say the consequences are less significant
    • common in sex offenders
  • Kennedy & Grubin (1992)
    interviewed male sex offenders
    • the majority blamed their victim and minimalised their crime
  • Salter (1988) 

    sex offenders use different types of denial to minimalise their crimes
    • denying it took place
    • denying the seriousness
    • denying there is something wrong with them
    • denying responsibility
  • positive evaluation of cognitive explanation
    • research support
    • real world applications - suggests we can use therapeutic techniques such as CBT to change how people think and behave
  • negative evaluation of cognitive explanation
    • difficult to study cognition so we have to infer from behaviour
    • Gender bias - research was androcentric, Gillian (1982) found that women prioritise ethics of care rather than justice