No active intervention, strategic (managed) realignment, hold the line, and advance the line.
What does no active intervention involve?
No active involvement involves:
No investment in defending against flooding or erosion, whether or not coastal defences have existed previously.
The coast is allowed to erode landward and/or flood.
What does strategic (managed) realignment involve?
Strategic realignment involves allowing the coastline to move naturally (in most cases to recede) but managing the process to direct it in certain areas.
What does hold the line involve?
Hold the line involves building and maintaining coastal defences so that the position of the shoreline remains the same over time.
What does advance the line involve?
Advance the line involves:
Building new coastal defences on the seaward side of the existing coastline.
Usually involves land reclamation.
How is the policy decided?
Deciding which policy applies depends on:
the economic value of the assets that could be protected, e.g. land
the technical feasibility of engineering solutions: may not be possible to 'hold the line' for mobile depositional features such as spits, or unstable cliffs.
the cultural and ecological value of land: it may be desirable to protect historic sites and areas of unusual diversity
pressure from communities: vocal local political campaigning to get an area protected
the social value of communities that have existed for centuries.
What are the three epochs (time periods) that SMPs use to plan for the future?
Up to 2025, 2025 - 2055, 2055+.
For example, a hold the line policy applied to an area up to 2025 may become a managed realignment policy after 2025. This is because by 2025 sea level rise is likely to have made 'hold the line' a much more expensive policy to apply.