Save
Stage 3
Stage 3 Clinical Introduction Course
Consent
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Eleanor Jubb
Visit profile
Cards (13)
Types of consent:
Implied
Sits in chair and opens mouth
Expressed
Oral or written
Oral - routine "low risk"
Written - extensive intervention or GA/sedation
Patient possesses the 3 key abilities to give informed consent:
Able to
comprehend
and
retain
information
Believe
information given
Able to weigh it in
balance
to make a choice
Communicate
Understand
Retain
Evaluate
Process of obtaining consent:
Use
Lay
language
Explain procedure's
purpose
Explain
benefits
,
risks
and
alternatives
Explain
consequences
of no
intervention
Do all of above without
duress
Competency for giving consent:
16
and over demonstrating
3
key abilities
Able to comprehend and retain information
Believe information given
Able to weigh it in balance to make a choice
Under 16 - may demo competence "
Gillick competence
" otherwise treat as child
Children - parental responsibility:
Children's act 1999 parental responsibility lies with:
Parents if
married
at time of birth
Mother
if not married at time of birth unless
father
on birth certificate or they marry or he gains responsibility via court order
Legal guardian
Local authority
if in care
Lack capacity to consent:
Refusal does not = lack
capacity
Re-discuss to clarify but not to
persuade
Lack capacity = essentially lacking the
3
abilities
Seek
advice
from physician they're under the care of
Mental capacity act 2005
:
Statutory duty for health (and other) care professionals
Advance
decisions
to refuse treatment
Lasting
power
of attorney
IMCA (
Independent Mental Capacity Advocate
)
Court of protection
Deprivation of
liberty
safeguards
Mental capacity act 2005:
5 principles of capacity
Assume capacity
unless established they lack it
Don't treat person as unable to make decisions unless all practicable steps to help them make the decision have all been undertaken and failed
Person is not unable to make decisions simply because they make an
unwise
decision
Any act done or decision made on behalf of someone lacking capacity has to be in their
best
interests
Any act done or decision made should be the
least restrictive
of the person's rights and freedom of action
Consenting those lacking capacity:
Next of kin can't consent, but should be
involved
No next of kin ->
IMCA
(independent mental capacity advoncate)
Scotland - proxy can be
legally
empowered
England - Lasting Power of Attorney can be granted (
financial
[property & affairs];
social
and
health care
)
Must be registered with Office of
public guardian
Else 2 doctors/dentists - "
patient's best interests
"
Patient's best interests, take into account:
Risks
,
benefits
, and
circumstances
Evidence
of patient's views e.g. Advance statement
Your
knowledge
of patient's views and that of other members of health team
Whether patient will regain
capacity
- non-urgent decision? Put off
Patient's best interests must be informed by:
Treatment
option that gives patient most choice in
future
Views of patient's
partner
or
relatives
Best interests:
Avoid discrimination
Examined by
Bolam
test
Would a reasonably competent health professional have acted in the same way?
Further examined by
Bolitho
test
Could a judge deem the professional opinion illogical due to other expert testimony?
Withdrawing consent:
Need to be
competent
Cry
of
anguish
- doesn't necessarily mean withdraw consent
Pause procedure discuss concerns, address concerns, exp consequences of stopping procedure at this point
If wish to stop and are competent then
STOP