believe lower class children have less experiences
boys get more freedom to girls
child liberationalists
the need to free children from adult control
believe childhood is not improving but getting worse
Mause 1924
The history of childhood is a nightmare from which we have only recently begun to awaken
the further back in history the lower level of childcare and more likely of children to be killed, terrorised or sexually abused
Aries and Shorter
Today's children are more valued, better cared for, protected and educated, have more rights than previous generations e.g. protected from abuse and labour, and enjoy better health
Better healthcare and living standards mean babies are more likely to survive, with the mortality rate now 4/1000 instead of 154/1,000 in 1900
child centred family
higher living standards and smaller family sizes (down from 5.7 births to 1.83 per women)
children are all in the same position
Estimate says 1 child costs parents £227,000 by their 21st birthday
march of progress say that the family is child-centred as children are no longer 'seen and not heard' as in Victorian times, instead they are the family's focal point that parents invest in emotionally and financially
more activities with children at the focal point
evaluation of march of progress view
based on a false/idealised view of children, ignoring inequality
ignores children's inequality in the opportunities and risks they face, and the inequalities between children/adults
inequalities among children
Differences in status/experiences based on nationality (90% of low-weight births are from developing countries)
Gender differences (boys more likely to be allowed to play out alone, girls do more domestic chores)
Ethnic differences (Asian parents more strict on daughters)
Class differences (children of unskilled manual workers more likely to experience conduct disorders, poor families more likely to die in infancy, fail in school, be on child protection register)
inequalities between children and adults
march of progress argue that adults use this power for the benefit and protection of children e.g. to stop child labour
firestone (1979) and holt (1974) argues that things the march of progress sees as care/protection are just a way of controlling and oppressing children, like excluding them from paid work
see the need to free children from adult control -> seen as 'child liberationalists'
control over childrens space
shops may display signs saying 'no schoolchildren'
children are forbidden to play in certain areas
close surveillance of children in certain public areas e.g. shopping centres
fears about road safety and stranger danger meaning more children are being driven to school
control over childrens time
adults control childrens daily routines including the times they get up, the time they go to school, the time they eat etc
adults control the speed their children grow up at
control over childrens body
adults control childrens bodies by controlling how they sit, walk, run, what they wear, hairstyles etc
adults wash their childrens face, teeth hair
adults kiss, cuddle, pikc up their children
adults may restrict how children touch their own bodies e.g. told not to pick their nose or suck their thumbs
control over childrens access to resources
children have limited opportunities to earn money so have to remain economically dependent on their parents
done through labour laws and compulsory schooling
child benefits go to the parents not the child
pocket money is dependent on behaviour and some parents restrict what it can be spent on
age patriarchy
Gittens1998 uses this term to describe inequalities between adults and children
argues there is also an age patriarchy of adult domination and child dependency
evaluation of child liberationists
some control over children is justified as they can't always safeguard themselves and act rationally
children arent as powerless as liberationists assume
the new sociology of childhood
doesnt see children as simply adults in the making instead sees children as active agents who create their own childhood
Smart (2011) says the new approach aims to include the views and experiences of children themselves while they are living through childhood