Moral character is a personality trait or disposition that has become habituated in the individual moral agent and is developed,nurtured and cultivated.
Both philosophers acknowledged the importance of the moral development of men and women.
One's moral character is not a possession like fine clothes or a house or even a Ph.D., but it may still be more or less one's own in a familiar sense, just as one's opinions and creed may be more or less one's own.
Moral character is not something that is imposed from the outside, but something that springs from the will of the moral agent.
A moral character develops as the individual grows into maturity.
Moral character traits must be praiseworthy and must have the content because of the agent's active discrimination rather than from the others, and it must have a reference to the value-making dimensions of the traits.
The moral agent has a responsibility for her own character.
The phrase "The individual is responsible for his character" means that she is the "one who is active in a certain way in the shaping of it".
One's character is shaped first and foremost by the will power of the individual as it is habituated.
Gilligan sees it logical that before one cares for another, one must care for herself first.
According to Gilligan, the self can only be "itself" because of the presence of the others, they are interdependent.
Gilligan argues that an individual cannot live part from others, and that one's concern for others has a higher value than the concern for personal survival.
According to Gilligan, as the individual matures, she realizes that she is not alone and starts to acknowledge that the self is also related with other selves in the community.
Gilligan acknowledged that initially the self cares for itself in order to survive.
Gilligan recognizes the presence of other selves in the community as a transition from self-interest to being concerned with others.
Gilligan's theory emphasizes the ethics of care, focusing on the individual's responsibility and personal commitment towards oneself, others, and the common good.
Gilligan's theory implies relationship, obligations, and responsibilities towards the other and the world as a whole.
One's character is also practiced everyday as part of self-determination.
Kohlberg's theory suggests that moral development is hierarchical and in the process of development, one cannot just proceed to a higher stage without passing through the lower ones.
A virtuous individual is cautious not falling into two extremes, that is, excess and deficiency.
Aristotle's theory on character begins with the idea that as a rational animal capable of decision making, the human person has to decide morally one way or the other.
Gilligan believes that this value of self and others determines one's moral decision.
A virtuous individual is one who does the right thing based on moderation.
Gilligan's theory of moral development is composed of threephases, that is, the concern for survival, goodness, and the imperative of care.
Kohlberg focuses on men's moral development while Gilligan focuses on women.
If one recognizes that a moral act is something that would eventually lead to a better life in the society, then that person would be willing to do such act.
One's decision, according to Aristotle, is influenced by one's character.
Gilligan's theory suggests that the standard or criteria for moral decision is caring for the others and the world at large.
Aristotle, Kohlberg and Gilligan's theories of moral development should be viewed simply as guideposts in moral decision making; they should not be taken as absolute.
Kohlberg and Gilligan offer us two frameworks of moral development, each complementing the other.
Kohlberg's theory also received fierce criticism most notably from the American psychologist Carol Gilligan, who argued that Kohlberg's theory neglect the patterns manifested on women's moral development.
Kohlberg's theory on moral development broke new ground in morality.
Gilligan acknowledged the influence of Kohlberg in her thinking while she was working with him as a research assistant.
The post-conventional level, which is focused on the common good and universal moral principles is the most challenging one.
Kohlberg believes that this stage is important because there is a higher value in obeying the law than by simply seeking the approval of one's peers.
According to Kohlberg, the fifth and sixth stages belong to this level.
Gilligan's work challenged Kohlberg's theory in terms of its generalizability.
For Kohlberg, laws can only be accepted or approved relative to the common good of the society.
Gilligan's theory of moral development is composed of three phases, that is, the concern for survival, goodness, and the imperative of care.
In fact, as Kohlberg (1987) says, this stage is anchored on the understanding of social mutuality and genuine interest in the welfare of others.