Doesn't require or allow for religiousfaith (believing without seeing)
Doesn't require religious experience
Anthropomorphic argument
Analogical Argument
David Hume
scottish philosopher
Empiricist, sceptic, probably an atheist
Criticised the Design Argument
Hume's Criticisms
No evidence the designer is God
Imperfection and Evil
Analogies between the way the universe works and the way machines work are unsound
Anthropomorphism
The universe could have developed by chance
No evidence the designer is God
Hume thought intelligent minds were attached to physical bodies
Rejects idea of metaphysical designer
Designer may have died
Could be a group of designers
"A wise man proportions his beliefs to his evidence"
Balanced scale metaphor
Imperfection and Evil
Epicurus: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?
The Inconsistent Triad - J.L. Mackie
Weaknesses of Imperfection and Evil argument
Free Will Defence
Process Theology
Free Will Defence
Freedom to choose between the highest goods and the highest evils means that there must be such good and evils in the world
Process Theology
Maintains that God is omnibenevolent, but not omnipotent. Theodicy is that of Irenaeus and Hick. Hick argued that evil is 'soul-making', without evil we would have to learn to be good.
Anthropic Principle
Modern form of the design argument
Cosmological constants have to be exactly what they are for human life to develop
We aren't here by chance
God 'finetuned' the conditions
The Universe could have developed by chance
Hume's 'Epicurean Hypothesis'
Epicurean Hypothesis
world is made of atoms
Given indefinite time, world became ordered
Backed up by multi-universe theory
Epicurus was wayyyyyy ahead of his time
Supported by modern atomic physics/ Big Bang Theory
Richard Swinburne
Very on the fence
Favours the simple answer
STRENGTHS of Hume's Epicurean hypothesis
multi-verse theory
Analogies between the way the universe works and the way machines work is unsound
Hume saw the universe as a vegetable
no designer
However, a vegetable is not as complex and needs a base for growth (soil)
Analogies between the way the universe works and the way machines work is unsound- STRENGTHS
Evolution, nature designs itself
"the heavens are utterly and blindly indifferent to humanity and everything else"- Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, 1986
Analogies between the way the universe works and the way machines work is unsound- WEAKNESSES
Evolution is compatible with a belief in God
Swinburn: Evolution is regulated by laws of nature, where do these laws come from?