multi-store model of memory

    Cards (23)

    • strength
      -free recall experiment supports concept of MSM
      -indicating words entered LTM after being rehearsed
      -last word in STM as new in memory
    • label
      A) recall
      B) primacy
      C) recency
    • immediate digit span test (capacity of STM) & trigram study (duration of STM) also support MSM
    • free recall experiments = lab experiment ( weakness )

      -very artificial
      -not reflective of how we use memory in real life
      -lacks ecological validity
      -can't be generalised to real life
    • free recall experiment = lab experiment (strengths)

      -high control of extraneous variables
      -cause & effect inferred
      -studies provide valid support for MSM
    • primacy effect

      -had time to rehearse the words
      -enter LTM
    • recency effect

      -Ps tend to recall last item on list
      -STM , no displacement
    • asymptote
      -middle position remembered poorly
      -increasing number of items fill STM, displaced before reaching LTM
    • long term memory 

      -may last permanently
      -leaves STM to long term through rehearsal
    • short term memory 

      receives info from sensory register by paying attention
    • who was the MSM created by?
      Atkinson & Atkinson
    • sensory register

      -info from 5 senses detected by sensory neurones
      -also info in STM & LTM gathered here
      -info passed to STM by paying attention
    • sensory register coding 

      -vision = iconic
      -sound = echoic
      -smell = olfactory
      -touch = haptic
      -taste = gustatory
    • sensory register capacity
      -very large
      -all sense impressions in one moment
      -only things paid attention to move on to STM
    • sensory register duration

      -very short
      -as low as 250 milliseconds
    • linear model 

      information shown to flow through system in one direction
    • passive stores
      stores hold onto info before being passed onto next
    • case studies of brain damaged patients

      HM & KF
      -suggest MSM too simple
    • HM features
      -STM normal
      -no LTM
      -couldn't learn new facts / events
      -could learn new skills
    • what does HM being able to learn skills show?

      there's more than one type of LTM
    • KF features
      -LTM normal
      -STM damaged (digit span of only 2)
    • how does KF's brain criticise MSM?
      -model doesn't explain how info is passed to LTM without being affected by impaired STM
    • label
      A) sensory register
      B) short term memory
      C) long term memory
      D) attention
      E) rehearsal
      F) maintenance
      G) retrieval
      H) info lost
      I) info lost
      J) info lost
    See similar decks