is overly simplistic and doesn't give a full picture of attahcmnet behaviour. One example- drive reduction theory, which forms part of the learning theory’s explanation, is no longer widely accepted, as while useful for explaining basic motivated behaviors, has limits in explaining complex human behaviors, such as those driven by social, cognitive, or emotional factors, and doesn't account for behaviors that don't reduce drives or actions that cause discomfort rather than reduce it. Furthermore learning theory suggests 'how' attahcments form but fails to explainy 'why' for example Bowlby's theory-an alternative explanations explains why it evolved- as a behaviour to give the best chance of survival as attachment protects infants from harm. Therefore are alternative explanation which provide much better holistic and accurate explanations for attachment